2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.02.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unilateral, multilevel, interlaminar fenestration in the removal of a multisegment cervical intramedullary ependymoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Taking these complications into consideration, some researchers have suggested fusing the spine, primarily at the time of laminectomy, to reduce the risk of spinal instability (15), but this additional procedure would increase the operative time, complications, and sequelae, and result in additional costs to patients, which is undesirable. Other procedures, like laminoplasty and interlaminar fenestration, have been described by different authors (8,21), but these procedures are also not free from complications. The concept of minimally invasive spine surgery evolved to avoid complications, and Yasargil et al were the first to use unilateral hemilaminectomy for the excision of intradural tumors in 1991 (18).…”
Section: █ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking these complications into consideration, some researchers have suggested fusing the spine, primarily at the time of laminectomy, to reduce the risk of spinal instability (15), but this additional procedure would increase the operative time, complications, and sequelae, and result in additional costs to patients, which is undesirable. Other procedures, like laminoplasty and interlaminar fenestration, have been described by different authors (8,21), but these procedures are also not free from complications. The concept of minimally invasive spine surgery evolved to avoid complications, and Yasargil et al were the first to use unilateral hemilaminectomy for the excision of intradural tumors in 1991 (18).…”
Section: █ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the increasing implementation of minimally invasive surgical techniques globally over the past decades has reflected the importance of reducing surgical trauma, there is no clinically robust clinical evidence for minimally invasive surgery for spinal lesions or tumors. No randomized controlled trials comparing procedures have been published; the nature of these lesions would make such a study difficult to coordinate regardless of whether it was in a single center or multi‐institutional setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such methods have demonstrated positive outcomes. However, apart from a large cohort study by Koch et al and some single case reports, little data is available on the efficacy of this procedure and how it compares with other modes of lesion resection 23,24 .…”
Section: Technical Requirements Of the Limited Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All patients underwent 3.0-T MRI examinations; lesions were observed in the cervical cord (86 patients), thoracic spine (18), conus medullaris (5), and filum terminale (3). The lesions involved 1-2 segments (12 patients), 3-4 segments (58), 5-6 segments (26), or ≥7 segments (16) (Figures 1-3).…”
Section: Imaging Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%