2023
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.107.063501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unimodular Hartle-Hawking wave packets and their probability interpretation

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is nothing exuberant about negative electric fields. This is forced upon us in the quantum theory [28][29][30] (see also [25]), should we require unitarity and starting from the connection representation. It is interesting that even classically we can find new solutions exhibiting what presumably is the peak of the wave packets moving from the a 2 < 0 to the a 2 > 0 region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is nothing exuberant about negative electric fields. This is forced upon us in the quantum theory [28][29][30] (see also [25]), should we require unitarity and starting from the connection representation. It is interesting that even classically we can find new solutions exhibiting what presumably is the peak of the wave packets moving from the a 2 < 0 to the a 2 > 0 region.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These oscillatory characteristics are conventionally attributed to the interference of the incoming part of the wave packet with the outgoing part [26]. The same interpretation holds for the wave packet under consideration, giving us the familiar notion of quantum bounce [28][29][30], making a good case for the small value of the ordering parameter as the preferred choice. On the other hand, the behavior of the wave packet for a broadly peaked energy distribution is highly counterintuitive, and the origin and interpretation of the oscillatory features at late times are a mystery at this juncture.…”
Section: Quantum Modelmentioning
confidence: 95%