2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41893-020-0529-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unintended consequences of water conservation on the use of treated municipal wastewater

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, as a result of rapid urbanization, population growth, climate change, desertification, and the uneven distribution of water resources in some parts of the world, water demand has increasingly outgrown its supply. These challenges have plunged the world into one form of water crisis or the other ( Gain and Wada, 2014 ; Ren et al., 2017 ; Schwabe et al., 2020 ; Sgroi et al., 2018 ). In some parts of the world, these scarcity challenges are even more visible when compared to other regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, as a result of rapid urbanization, population growth, climate change, desertification, and the uneven distribution of water resources in some parts of the world, water demand has increasingly outgrown its supply. These challenges have plunged the world into one form of water crisis or the other ( Gain and Wada, 2014 ; Ren et al., 2017 ; Schwabe et al., 2020 ; Sgroi et al., 2018 ). In some parts of the world, these scarcity challenges are even more visible when compared to other regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have outlined the importance of WWR in the areas of agriculture, industry, urban development, domestic reuse, potable water supply, and others. In the United States, for example, metropolitan treated WWR, which provides horticultural and urban irrigation system, industrial processes, and potable water use, is reported to have expanded from 4 million m 3 per day in 1995 to almost 8.5 million m 3 per day in 2015 ( Schwabe et al., 2020 ). Its benefits, especially in agriculture, has been highlighted by several studies ranging from sufficient nutrients, fertilizer alternatives, prevention of water pollution, increased energy savings, increased food production amongst others ( Corcoran et al., 2010 ; FAO, 2015 ; Jaramillo and Restrepo, 2017 ; Omole et al., 2019 ; Qadir et al., 2010 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Possible sources of sodium within UOSA's sewershed include the down-drain disposal of sodiumcontaining drinking water and sodium-containing household products [72][73][74], use of water softeners in commercial and residential locations [53], as well as permitted and non-permitted sodium discharges from industrial and commercial customers. The sodium concentration in UOSA's effluent may also be elevated due to structural and non-structural water conservation measures that concentrate salts in wastewater streams [75,76]. Indeed, sodium concentration measured in daily flow-weighted composite samples of UOSA's discharge are consistently higher than sodium concentrations measured in grab samples collected downstream on the Bull Run at station ST45 and on the Occoquan River at station ST10 (Figure 1b).…”
Section: Field Sitementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Possible sources of sodium within UOSA's sewershed include the down-drain disposal of sodium-containing drinking water and sodium-containing household products [69][70][71], as well as permitted and nonpermitted sodium discharges from industrial and commercial customers. The sodium concentration in UOSA's effluent may also be elevated due to structural and non-structural water conservation measures that concentrate salts in wastewater streams [72,73]. Indeed, sodium concentration measured in daily flow-weighted composite samples of UOSA's discharge are consistently higher than sodium concentrations measured in grab samples collected downstream on the Bull Run at station ST45 and on the Occoquan River at station ST10 ( Figure 1b).…”
Section: Field Sitementioning
confidence: 98%