2016
DOI: 10.1111/labr.12075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unions and Income Inequality: A Heterogeneous Panel Co‐integration and Causality Analysis

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 91 publications
0
11
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In Korea, it is more fragmented and divided due to neoliberalisational reform after an International Monetary Fund economic crisis 14. Korea also has a lower labour union density and a lower collective agreement coverage rate 15 16. Evident from our results, a proportion of working population’s employment is set on a daily contract basis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…In Korea, it is more fragmented and divided due to neoliberalisational reform after an International Monetary Fund economic crisis 14. Korea also has a lower labour union density and a lower collective agreement coverage rate 15 16. Evident from our results, a proportion of working population’s employment is set on a daily contract basis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…In Figure , we test the sensitivity of our results to particular observations by sequentially excluding one region at a time from the sample as in Herzer (). Panel A shows the resulting estimated effects on the employment of natives and the associated t ‐statistics.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A common view in the Nordic countries is that higher unionization rates and coordinated wage-setting reduce wage inequality; see Barth and Moene (2013). Empirical evidence also suggests that a higher level of unionization reduces income inequality in countries like the US and the UK; see Card et al (2004) and Herzer (2016). In particular, Aidt and Tzannatos (2002) find that higher union density depresses the wage differentials between high-and low-skilled workers.…”
Section: Deunionization and Polarizationmentioning
confidence: 99%