1985
DOI: 10.1016/0021-8502(85)90079-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unipolar and bipolar diffusion charging of ultrafine aerosol particles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
199
0
1

Year Published

1989
1989
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 294 publications
(209 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
9
199
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Results obtained with the Boltzmann distribution could be quite different from those obtained with other reasonable charge distributions for other circumstances, for example, for nonequilibrium aerosols or for particles that are in equilibrium in an ionic atmosphere that is not purely bipolar, not having equal diffusivities among the ionic species (see, for example, Porstendorfer et al, 1984;Adachi et al, 1985). In the atmosphere, the negative ions tend to have higher mobility and diffusivity than the positive ions, leading to about a factor of two more negative than positive charge on particles much smaller than 1 pm (Adachi et al, 1985).…”
Section: Aerosol Charge Distributionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Results obtained with the Boltzmann distribution could be quite different from those obtained with other reasonable charge distributions for other circumstances, for example, for nonequilibrium aerosols or for particles that are in equilibrium in an ionic atmosphere that is not purely bipolar, not having equal diffusivities among the ionic species (see, for example, Porstendorfer et al, 1984;Adachi et al, 1985). In the atmosphere, the negative ions tend to have higher mobility and diffusivity than the positive ions, leading to about a factor of two more negative than positive charge on particles much smaller than 1 pm (Adachi et al, 1985).…”
Section: Aerosol Charge Distributionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In the atmosphere, the negative ions tend to have higher mobility and diffusivity than the positive ions, leading to about a factor of two more negative than positive charge on particles much smaller than 1 pm (Adachi et al, 1985).…”
Section: Aerosol Charge Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…C c (Kn i ) is the empirical Cunningham (1910) correction factor, which is a function of Kn i , the momentum Knudsen number (Friedlander 2000) for entity i, as opposed to the diffusive Knudsen number, which applies to mass transfer processes and is dependent upon f i . Finally, in the nondimensionalization of Fuchs' diffusion charging theory, the mean free path of the diffusing entity is taken to be (1.329/f i )(kTm i ) 1/2 (Adachi et al 1985) and the expression given by Natanson (1960) is used to determine the limiting sphere radius. With these definitions, all six examined collision kernel expressions appropriately collapse into the form H(Kn D ), allowing for comparison to mean first passage time calculations.…”
Section: Comparison To Existing Kernelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With recent advances in computational capabilities, Brownian dynamics simulations can accurately predict thermally driven particle-particle collision rates (the Z → ∞ limit); hence, they should be able to provide a means for more detailed examination of collision kernel expressions than is possible with currently available experimental approaches. Second, various authors have used different definitions for the mean persistence distance of the colliding entities (Jeans 1954;Dahneke 1983;Adachi et al 1985;Rader 1985;Sceats 1989;Gatti and Kortshagen 2008), and hence different definitions of the dimensionless parameter (i.e., the ratio of the persistence distance to the collision radius) used to determine whether a collision is continuum, free molecular, or transition regime process. We refer to this parameter as Kn D , the diffusive Knudsen number (Loyalka 1976;Dahneke 1983;Rogak and Flagan 1992), which must approach zero in the continuum limit and approach ∞ in the free molecular limit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept is based on the charging of aerosol particles by the corona-produced unipolar air ions (Adachi et al, 1985;Hernandez-Sierra et al, 2003;Wiedensohler et al, 1994) in the vicinity of a respirator. The continuously emitted ions impose significant electric charges of the same polarity on the airborne particles and the mask surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%