2018
DOI: 10.1002/jclp.22708
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unique and shared features of narcissistic and antisocial personality disorders: Implications for assessing and modeling externalizing traits

Abstract: Objectives: We aimed to determine which, if any, features distinguish antisocial and narcissistic personality disorders (ASPD and NPD), two overlapping externalizing disorders.Methods: A large sample of outpatients (N = 2,149) completed interview measures assessing personality pathology, other psychopathology, and impairment. The structure of antisocial and narcissistic traits was examined using both exploratory bifactor and traditional exploratory factor analytic approaches, and we examined relations for our … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 29 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, we also included psychosocial ratings of the past number of inpatient hospitalizations for psychiatric issues, lifetime number of suicide attempts, work missed over the past 5 years due to psychiatric reasons (rated on 1-10 scale; higher scores indicate more work missed), and psychosocial functioning impairment ratings over the past 5 years (rated on 1-7 scale; higher scores indicate more impairment). Gorlin, Dalrymple, Chelminski, & Zimmerman, 2016;Stanton & Zimmerman, 2018;Zimmerman, 2016). Analyses of interrater reliability indicate that kappas for all diagnoses are within the good to excellent range.…”
Section: Measures and Study Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Finally, we also included psychosocial ratings of the past number of inpatient hospitalizations for psychiatric issues, lifetime number of suicide attempts, work missed over the past 5 years due to psychiatric reasons (rated on 1-10 scale; higher scores indicate more work missed), and psychosocial functioning impairment ratings over the past 5 years (rated on 1-7 scale; higher scores indicate more impairment). Gorlin, Dalrymple, Chelminski, & Zimmerman, 2016;Stanton & Zimmerman, 2018;Zimmerman, 2016). Analyses of interrater reliability indicate that kappas for all diagnoses are within the good to excellent range.…”
Section: Measures and Study Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 91%