2019
DOI: 10.1080/03605302.2019.1581804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uniqueness and convergence on equilibria of the Keller–Segel system with subcritical mass

Abstract: This paper is concerned with the uniqueness of solutions to the following nonlocal semi-linear elliptic equationwhere Ω is a bounded domain in R 2 and β, λ are positive parameters. The above equation arises as the stationary problem of the well-known classical Keller-Segel model describing chemotaxis. For equation ( * ) with Neumann boundary condition, we establish an integral inequality and prove that the solution of ( * ) is unique if 0 < λ ≤ 8π and u satisfies some symmetric properties. While for ( * ) with… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…), which has been extensively studied in the past few decades and a vast number of results have been obtained (cf. previous works 3‐7 and references therein). In contrast, the results of () with non‐constant γ ( v ) and ϕ ( v ) are very few and to the best of our knowledge the existing results are available only for the special case ϕfalse(vfalse)=γfalse(vfalse), that is, α=0 in (), which simplifies the Keller–Segel system () into ().…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…), which has been extensively studied in the past few decades and a vast number of results have been obtained (cf. previous works 3‐7 and references therein). In contrast, the results of () with non‐constant γ ( v ) and ϕ ( v ) are very few and to the best of our knowledge the existing results are available only for the special case ϕfalse(vfalse)=γfalse(vfalse), that is, α=0 in (), which simplifies the Keller–Segel system () into ().…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…We remark for the radially symmetric domain normalΩ2, if the solution is only required to be constant on the boundary (not necessarily radially symmetric), it was shown in previous work 7 that () only admits a unique constant solution.…”
Section: Stationary Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…We remark for the radially symmetric domain Ω ⊂ R 2 , if the solution is only required to be constant on the boundary (not necessarily radially symmetric), it was shown in [40] that (4.10) only admits a unique constant solution.…”
Section: Motility With Exponential Decaymentioning
confidence: 96%
“…[29]), which has been extensively studied in the past few decades and a vast number of results have been obtained (cf. [7,10,16,17,34,40] and references therein). In contrast, the results of (1.1) with non-constant γ(v) and φ(v) are very few and to the best of our knowledge the existing results are available only for the special case φ(v) = −γ ′ (v), i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Precisely, the global bounded solutions exists in one dimension [28]. In space of two dimensions (n = 2), there exists a critical mass m * = 4π χ such that the solution is bounded and asymptotically converges to its unique constant equilibrium if Ω u 0 dx < m * [27,35] and blows up if Ω u 0 dx > m * [18], where Ω u 0 dx denotes the initial cell mass. In the higher dimensions (n ≥ 3), for any Ω u 0 dx > 0, the solution may blow up in finite time [39].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%