1983
DOI: 10.1070/sm1983v044n04abeh000980
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uniqueness and Stability of the Solution of a Problem of Geometry in the Large

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the integral transforms involved here are the cosine transform and the hemispherical transform, Theorem 4 implies a stability inequality with Hölder exponent arbitrarily close to 2/(n(n + 1)). A stability result for this data in the case n = 3 was also derived in [2], but requires that a 6th-order derivative of F (K, ·) is uniformly small.…”
Section: Hug and Schneidermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the integral transforms involved here are the cosine transform and the hemispherical transform, Theorem 4 implies a stability inequality with Hölder exponent arbitrarily close to 2/(n(n + 1)). A stability result for this data in the case n = 3 was also derived in [2], but requires that a 6th-order derivative of F (K, ·) is uniformly small.…”
Section: Hug and Schneidermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( )jku( )k L1(S n¡ 1 ) µ c(n)k n=2¡1 ku( )k L1(S n¡ 1 )[17] and ¶ k = O(e ¡² k ) (by Corollary 3), the Fourier coe¯cients b function f ( ) decrease exponentially with increasing k. Hence, f ( ) is analytic on S n¡1[17] 6…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%