2010
DOI: 10.1007/s00220-010-1072-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uniqueness of Smooth Stationary Black Holes in Vacuum: Small Perturbations of the Kerr Spaces

Abstract: Following the program started in [24], we attempt to remove the analyticity assumption in the the well known Hawking-Carter-Robinson uniqueness result for regular stationary vacuum black holes. Unlike [24], which was based on a tensorial characterization of the Kerr solutions, due to Mars [29], we rely here on Hawking's original strategy, which is to reduce the case of general stationary space-times to that of stationary and axi-symmetric spacetimes for which the Carter-Robinson uniqueness result holds. In thi… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
140
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
140
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We further note that a new approach to Hawking's rigidity without analyticity [1,2] as yield significant breakthroughs in the vacuum case. According to A.D. Ionescu (private communication) the generalization of the results to electro-vacuum should follow by similar techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We further note that a new approach to Hawking's rigidity without analyticity [1,2] as yield significant breakthroughs in the vacuum case. According to A.D. Ionescu (private communication) the generalization of the results to electro-vacuum should follow by similar techniques.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Also, no previous work known to us establishes the asymptotic behavior, as needed for the proof of uniqueness, of the relevant harmonic maps. More specifically: the necessity to control the behavior at points where the horizon meets the rotation axis, prior to [13], seems to have been neglected; at infinity, which requires special attention in the electro-vacuum case, part of the necessary estimates were imposed as extra conditions, beyond asymptotic flatness; (2) also, an apparent disregard for the singular character, at the axis, of the hyperbolic distance (4.14) between the maps, even at large distance, appears to be the norm. A detailed asymptotic analysis is carried out in Section 5.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming zero angular momentum, the final black hole is constrained by uniqueness theorems to be diffeomorphic to the Schwarzschild black hole [27][28][29][30][31]. However, the diffeomorphism might be singular inside the Killing horizon and act as a source for the supertranslation field.…”
Section: Black Hole Memoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since all physical processes involved in merging, accretion and collapse are highly non-spherically symmetric, the ≥ 2 spherical harmonics in the right-hand side of (2) will be of order of the mass. Assuming C| initial = ∆C| i 0 = 0 (which would have to be assessed) and after solving for the differential operator, the supertranslation field will be O(M ).Assuming zero angular momentum, the final black hole is constrained by uniqueness theorems to be diffeomorphic to the Schwarzschild black hole [27][28][29][30][31]. However, the diffeomorphism might be singular inside the Killing horizon and act as a source for the supertranslation field.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A peculiarity of this procedure is that if the spacetime is not stationary, the approximate Killing vector associated with a time translation does not have the same asymptotic behaviour as a time translation. 1 The Killing spinor initial data equations consist of three conditions: one of them differential (the spatial Killing spinor equation) 2 and two algebraic conditions. Following the spirit of [15] we construct a generalisation of the spatial Killing spinor equation-the approximate Killing A precise formulation will be given in the main text.…”
Section: A Characterisation Of Kerr Datamentioning
confidence: 99%