2003
DOI: 10.1007/s00211-002-0433-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uniqueness of the Gaussian interval quadrature formula

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the (i) part, the proof is exactly the same as it is given in [2]. Actually, the same proof suffices to prove the previous lemma for any strictly positive weight function w(x) = dµ/dx on (−1, 1), which does not take zero as its value.…”
Section: Uniqueness For Jacobi Weightmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For the (i) part, the proof is exactly the same as it is given in [2]. Actually, the same proof suffices to prove the previous lemma for any strictly positive weight function w(x) = dµ/dx on (−1, 1), which does not take zero as its value.…”
Section: Uniqueness For Jacobi Weightmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…[7]). Only recently in [1] and [2], quadrature rules involving integrals of a function on some parts of supp(µ) have been investigated, i.e., quadrature rules of the form…”
Section: K )mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The rest of the proof goes exactly as it is given in [3]. The proof has N steps, where N is defined by h = (N + η) ε 0 4 , 0 < η ≤ 1, with h = max{h 0 , .…”
Section: Proof Of the Main Results In The Gauss-lobatto Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [2], Bojanov Evidently, the existence of the Gaussian interval quadrature formula (1.1) follows directly from this general result. In [3], it was proved that for the weight w(x) = 1 on [−1, 1], the Gaussian interval quadrature rule is also unique, and in [7] the same result was proved for the Jacobi weight function on [−1, 1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%