1986
DOI: 10.1364/josaa.3.001073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uniqueness of the inverse source problem for quasi-homogeneous, partially coherent sources

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Uniqueness can be restored when referring to incoherent (i.e., delta correlated sources) or quasi-homogeneous sources [28,33,39]. In the case of incoherent sources, namely, the case of interest in the present paper, Γ j s (x , x ) = I(x )δ(x − x ), so that Eq.…”
Section: Formulation Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Uniqueness can be restored when referring to incoherent (i.e., delta correlated sources) or quasi-homogeneous sources [28,33,39]. In the case of incoherent sources, namely, the case of interest in the present paper, Γ j s (x , x ) = I(x )δ(x − x ), so that Eq.…”
Section: Formulation Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…where, again with an abuse of notation, Γ e (x 1 , x 2 ) = Γ e (x 1 , x 2 , 0), defines the inverse source problem for partially coherent sources and fields [23,28,33,39], and, in particular, that of deducing second order statistics of the source from second order statistics of the radiated field on the segment (−a, a) of the z = d axis. As known, not only in the case of coherent sources, but also when partially coherent radiators are involved, this problem has a nonunique solution [40].…”
Section: Formulation Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where, again with an abuse of notation, Γ e (x 1 , x 2 ) = Γ e (x 1 , x 2 , 0), defines the inverse source problem for partially coherent sources and fields [2], [8], [11], [14], and, in particular, that of deducing second order statistics of the source from second order statistics of the radiated field on D I . In this paper, we consider the case of incoherent (i.e., delta correlated sources), for which Γ j (x , x ) = I(x )δ(x − x ), I being the intensity of the source [2], [8], [11], [14], so that eq.…”
Section: Formulation Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we consider the case of incoherent (i.e., delta correlated sources), for which Γ j (x , x ) = I(x )δ(x − x ), I being the intensity of the source [2], [8], [11], [14], so that eq. (5) particularizes as (6) is an expression of the van Cittert-Zernike theorem [10].…”
Section: Formulation Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LaHaie has investigated the inverse source problem for arbitrary, three-dimensional, wide-sense stationary, spatially and temporally partially coherent sources and fields [2]. And later, LaHaie has also investigated the inverse problem of partially coherent sources which can be stated as determining the mutual coherent function of a localized random source from measurements of the mutual coherence function of the field generated by the source [3]. Recently, two kinds of the fast Fourier transform algorithm have been used to study of inverse Collins formula [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%