2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfa.2009.04.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uniqueness results for nonlocal Hamilton–Jacobi equations

Abstract: We are interested in nonlocal eikonal equations describing the evolution of interfaces moving with a nonlocal, non-monotone velocity. For these equations, only the existence of global-in-time weak solutions is available in some particular cases. In this paper, we propose a new approach for proving uniqueness of the solution when the front is expanding. This approach simplifies and extends existing results for dislocation dynamics. It also provides the first uniqueness result for a Fitzhugh-Nagumo system. The k… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We point out that, in the case of nonnegative velocities, the global existence and uniqueness were first obtained by Alvarez et al [1] and then by Barles et al [9] using different arguments. These uniqueness results were recently extended by Barles et al in [8], using a new approach allowing to relax the assumptions of [1,9]. Moreover, the proof proposed in [8] is simpler than that of [1,9] and requires a mild regularity on the velocity.…”
Section: Setting Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We point out that, in the case of nonnegative velocities, the global existence and uniqueness were first obtained by Alvarez et al [1] and then by Barles et al [9] using different arguments. These uniqueness results were recently extended by Barles et al in [8], using a new approach allowing to relax the assumptions of [1,9]. Moreover, the proof proposed in [8] is simpler than that of [1,9] and requires a mild regularity on the velocity.…”
Section: Setting Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…These uniqueness results were recently extended by Barles et al in [8], using a new approach allowing to relax the assumptions of [1,9]. Moreover, the proof proposed in [8] is simpler than that of [1,9] and requires a mild regularity on the velocity.…”
Section: Setting Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…We are also interested in the following system, 5) which is obtained as the asymptotics as ε → 0 of the following FitzhughNagumo system arising in neural wave propagation or chemical kinetics (see [18]):…”
Section: 22mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our result is strictly related to Theorem 5.8 in [4], where the authors estimate the perimeter of sets enjoying an internal cone property. Indeed, the same arguments of Corollary 4.3 (for θ = 0, 0 < C < 1) easily gives the same conclusion of [4]. See also [26, Proposition 2.4].…”
Section: Standing Hypothesis and First Consequencesmentioning
confidence: 63%