2017
DOI: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unit Costing of Health Extension Worker Activities in Ethiopia: A Model for Managers at the District and Health Facility Level

Abstract: Background: Over the last decade, Ethiopia has made impressive national improvements in health outcomes, including reductions in maternal, neonatal, infant, and child mortality attributed in large part to their Health Extension Program (HEP). As this program continues to evolve and improve, understanding the unit cost of health extension worker (HEW) services is fundamental to planning for future growth and ensuring adequate financial support to deliver effective primary care throughout the country. Methods: … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An incremental cost analysis [10] was used, in which the costs of the CLTS intervention were compared to the costs of the limited sanitation-related activities usually undertaken by HEWs (which characterizes what took place in control areas). The cost of the latter is estimated using a time and motion study of HEWs activities in Ethiopia [35][36][37][38][39]-full details are provided in Text S1. The Ethiopian government submitted a proposal for the integrated water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) project to KOICA in 2013 and the target areas of the project were selected among the districts that had no previous CLTS intervention [40].…”
Section: Cost Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An incremental cost analysis [10] was used, in which the costs of the CLTS intervention were compared to the costs of the limited sanitation-related activities usually undertaken by HEWs (which characterizes what took place in control areas). The cost of the latter is estimated using a time and motion study of HEWs activities in Ethiopia [35][36][37][38][39]-full details are provided in Text S1. The Ethiopian government submitted a proposal for the integrated water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) project to KOICA in 2013 and the target areas of the project were selected among the districts that had no previous CLTS intervention [40].…”
Section: Cost Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%