2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2018.03.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unit mechanisms of fission gas release: Current understanding and future needs

Abstract: Gaseous fission product transport and release has a large impact on fuel performance, degrading fuel and gap properties. While gaseous fission product behavior has been investigated with bulk reactor experiments and simplified analytical models, recent improvements in experimental and modeling approaches at the atomistic and mesoscales are beginning to reveal new understanding of the unit mechanisms that define fission product behavior. Here, existing research on the basic mechanisms of fission gas release dur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
26
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 136 publications
(241 reference statements)
0
26
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The noble gas density in the intragranular bubbles ranges from about 10 nm-to slightly more than 30 nm- [3,7,8] while for the intergranular bubbles, the estimated densities are less than 10 nm- [6]. The molar fraction of Kr in the Xe/Kr noble gas mixture in the bubble, of 0.12-0.14 [2,6], mirrors the production rates of the two noble gases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The noble gas density in the intragranular bubbles ranges from about 10 nm-to slightly more than 30 nm- [3,7,8] while for the intergranular bubbles, the estimated densities are less than 10 nm- [6]. The molar fraction of Kr in the Xe/Kr noble gas mixture in the bubble, of 0.12-0.14 [2,6], mirrors the production rates of the two noble gases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…These noble gases have a very low solubility in the fuel matrix and, consequently, they precipitate together into the fuel under the form of intragranular and intergranular bubbles [1]. In low burnup fuels, the intragranular bubbles are typically less than 10 nm in diameter [2][3][4] while in high burnup fuels, some of these small bubbles can coalesce to lead to a bimodal bubbles population, with the largest bubbles of tens [2,3] or even hundreds [5] of nanometers in diameter. The intergranular bubbles are generally larger in size than the intragranular ones, with a diameter of several hundreds of nanometers [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This mechanism is affected by other parameters, as departure from stoichiometry, local chemistry, and particular microstructural features (as for instance microporosity) that can interact with the fission gases. [146][147][148] In some cases, for particular burnup and temperature conditions, the concentration of gas bubbles seems sufficient to release a burst of fission gases, eventually producing cracks in the fuel pellet.…”
Section: Radiation-induced Mechanical and Microstructural Effects In mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is not an easy task from a modelling point of view: the gas pressure calculation requires an equation of state that is applicable to high pressures and that the input to this equation, namely the cavity volume and gas inventory (molecular density and composition of gaseous fission products) are accurately calculated together with the gas temperature. Prevalent computational tools for thermal-mechanical analyses of nuclear fuel do not generally model the fuel microstructure evolution and the fission gas distribution at this level of detail [39]. This is particularly true for the evolution of the high burnup structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%