2021
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.104.054502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unitarity bounds for semileptonic decays in lattice QCD

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
56
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
2
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The last PDG review [10] quotes for the exclusive and inclusive determinations of |V ub | the values |V ub | excl • 10 3 = 3.70 (10) exp (12) th = 3.70 (16) from B → π ν decays and…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The last PDG review [10] quotes for the exclusive and inclusive determinations of |V ub | the values |V ub | excl • 10 3 = 3.70 (10) exp (12) th = 3.70 (16) from B → π ν decays and…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this letter we have applied the DM method [1,2] to the lattice computations of the FFs entering the semileptonic B → D * ν decays, produced recently by the FNAL/MILC Collaborations [3] at non-zero recoil. Thanks to the DM method the FFs have been extrapolated in the whole kinematical range accessible to the semileptonic decays in a completely model-independent and non-perturbative way, implementing exactly both unitarity and kinematical constraints.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end we adopt the DM method of Refs. [1,4] to obtain the FFs in the whole kinematical range starting from the lattice computations performed at small, but non-vanishing values of the recoil variable w. The crucial advantage of the DM approach is that the extrapolations of the FFs can be performed in a fully model-independent and nonperturbative way, since no assumption about the functional dependence of the FFs on the recoil w is made and all the theoretical inputs of the DM approach are computed on the lattice (see Refs. [2,5]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations