China’s New United Front Work in Hong Kong 2019
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-8483-7_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

United Front Work on Six Religions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a mechanism intrareligious dialogue through the Six Religions (Buddhism, Confucianism, Taoism, Islam, Catholicism and Protestantism) bodies originated in the late-1970s (Lo et al , 2019), but the organizations “came to be known collectively” in 2003 (Nedilsky, 2009, p. 218). Presently, this framework is rather an example of administrative co-optation of religious organizations than a lobbyist endeavor of the latest, which Lo et al (2019) find “commendable” and effective.…”
Section: The Contexts Of Interreligious Hong Kongmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is a mechanism intrareligious dialogue through the Six Religions (Buddhism, Confucianism, Taoism, Islam, Catholicism and Protestantism) bodies originated in the late-1970s (Lo et al , 2019), but the organizations “came to be known collectively” in 2003 (Nedilsky, 2009, p. 218). Presently, this framework is rather an example of administrative co-optation of religious organizations than a lobbyist endeavor of the latest, which Lo et al (2019) find “commendable” and effective.…”
Section: The Contexts Of Interreligious Hong Kongmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Tse (2016) noted, “upon the handover of Hong Kong to China in 1997, that close partnership underwent a change, and in the years since churches have had to deal with new forms of local and central government” (p. 3). Moreover, although institutionalization is unequal across Hong Kong religions (Lo et al , 2019), the city’s dispersed religious composition, together with delicate yet established collective interreligious mechanism, constitute “secularity in the sense of an accommodation between religious groups” (Wohlrab-Sahr and Burchardt, 2012, p. 894). This makes the threat of a “fuse of religion and state” (Ahdar and Leigh, 2013) barely feasible.…”
Section: The Contexts Of Interreligious Hong Kongmentioning
confidence: 99%