“United in diversity” public sector financial, statistical and budgetary reporting in the European Union

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to approach, both theoretically and empirically, public sector reporting at European Union (EU) level. It contributes to the accounting harmonisation literature by revealing the actual status of governmental reporting at the national level. Design/methodology/approach The paper carried out an exploratory data analysis of the harmonisation of statistical, budgetary and financial reporting at the EU level. A mapping visualisation offers a comprehensive overview of the current state of connections between these reporting systems. Findings The results reveal the complexity of governments’ reporting systems homogeneity, although all stakeholders recognise the struggle for the principles of performance and transparency in the public sector. Thus, these are following the EU Commission’s study, which concludes that there is significant heterogeneity in the accounting and reporting practices applied transversely throughout all Member States. Research limitations/implications The relevance of the study is comprehensive, from the economic environment to the practitioners, from the international regulatory bodies to the national ones, all can assess and quantify the significance of the past, present and future changes, considering their needs. The limitations of the research regard the documentation background because uniformly accessing some information presented by the EU Member States is relatively tricky. Future research might focus on the effects of these changes as they occur. Originality/value The study contributes to the scientific literature in the public sector through a comprehensive, well-supported and statistically grounded analysis performed at EU level, able to provide reliable results and to support valuable future recommendations towards harmonised reporting. Moreover, it supports and encourages all national and international efforts for improving the comparability of financial, budgetary and aggregated statistical reports.

Governmental accounting and budgeting in Malta and Poland – a different dance to the same tune

“…The results of this research reveal the complexity of governments' reporting systems homogeneity, although all stakeholders recognize the struggle for the principles of performance and transparency in the public sector (Tiron Tudor and Nistor, 2020). The need to appear legitimate underlies these struggles.…”

Analysis of the Use and Usefulness of Public Sector Entities' Reports in the Republic of Croatia

“…Tako je i pojava svjetske financijske krize 2008. u zemljama članicama Europske unije rezultirala potrebom za pružanjem pravovremenih, pouzdanih i usporedivih informacija s ciljem učinkovitijeg upravljanja jedinicama javnog sektora, uključujući upravljanje javnim dugom i prekomjernim deficitom. Pojedini autori istaknuli su da su financijski izvještaji ključni u procesu poboljšanja i iskazivanja odgovornosti, kao i donošenja odluka (Ezzamel, Hyndman, Johnsen, Lapsley & Pallot, 2005), stoga ne začuđuje činjenica da se financijsko izvještavanje jedinica javnog sektora nalazi u središtu interesa brojnih istraživača u posljednjih 15-ak godina (Yamamoto, 2008;Brusca & Montesinos, 2013;Christiaens, Vanhee, Manes-Rossi, Aversano, & van Cauwenberge, 2015;Moretti, 2016;Tiron-Tudor, Nistor & Stefanescu, 2020).…”

The IPSASB's recent strategies: opportunities for academics and standard-setters

“…These strategic questions suggest research topics of interest to standard-setters and policy makers. For example, papers by Caruana et al (2019), Tiron-Tudor et al (2019) and Dasí Gonzáleza et al (2018), all contribute to an understanding of the relationship between the GFS and financial reporting.…”