2006
DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000248132.15231.fe
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

United States’ Trends and Regional Variations in Lumbar Spine Surgery: 1992–2003

Abstract: Study Design-Repeated cross-sectional analysis using national Medicare data from the Dartmouth Atlas Project.Objectives-To describe recent trends and geographic variation in population-based rates of lumbar fusion spine surgery.Summary of Background Data-Lumbar fusion rates have increased dramatically during the 80s and even more so in the 90s. The most rapid increase appeared to follow the approval of a new surgical implant device.Methods-Medicare claims and enrollment data were used to calculate age-, sex-an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

13
502
3
4

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 788 publications
(522 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
13
502
3
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Rates of ALIF and PLIF varied approximately twofold among geographic areas whereas rates of posterior interarticular fusion and combined discectomy and fusion varied threefold. The coefficient of variation in surgery rates was similar when comparing total hip arthroplasty (21.3) with standard discectomy (25.6) and laminectomy (26.2) and below the magnitude of variability in rates of fusion (at least 55.1) in accordance with the results of Weinstein et al [12]. Table 2 shows the factors associated with the use of types of spinal surgery.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Rates of ALIF and PLIF varied approximately twofold among geographic areas whereas rates of posterior interarticular fusion and combined discectomy and fusion varied threefold. The coefficient of variation in surgery rates was similar when comparing total hip arthroplasty (21.3) with standard discectomy (25.6) and laminectomy (26.2) and below the magnitude of variability in rates of fusion (at least 55.1) in accordance with the results of Weinstein et al [12]. Table 2 shows the factors associated with the use of types of spinal surgery.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 75%
“…This is a significant limitation of the present study. Hence, given the variation of surgical indications, techniques, and methods [3,17], the present findings are not generalizable to the population at large. However, the current study is based on the setting of preference-based shared decision making.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…These facts and the fear of adjacent level syndrome have encouraged the development of dynamic implants or disc prosthesis. Regarding lumbar fusion procedures, several studies report on notable regional differences in the number of patients operated, depending on surgeons' beliefs or on other subjective factors, such as organization and financing of health services [18,47], rather than on clinical or demographic criteria. Several studies emphasize the importance of an adequate selection of patients to undergo surgical lumbar interventions [11,12,14,39].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%