2022
DOI: 10.5430/wjel.v12n6p50
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uniting for Peace: A Speech Act Analysis of the United Nations General Assembly Resolution 377 A (V)

Abstract: This study examines the use of speech acts in the United Nations General Assembly Resolution number 377 A (V). Using Bach’s (2003) speech acts categorizations, the study aims to identify the illocutionary and perlocutionary acts used in the resolution as it aims to examine how the resolution is constructed and interpreted. The study reveals that the resolution incorporated instances of directives, constatives and commissives illocutionary acts. The perlocutionary effects of the directive illocutionary acts com… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This standard of education is also necessary as it provides students with the platform and the space to think out of the box to develop new ideas regarding current challenges to improve the quality of life. The use of the critical constructivist approach in classrooms can assist students in developing critical thinking, creative thinking, communication, leadership, innovation, problem-solving, decision-making, and active listening skills as it empowers students and puts them in the driving seat through the promotion and motivation of participation and partaking [35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This standard of education is also necessary as it provides students with the platform and the space to think out of the box to develop new ideas regarding current challenges to improve the quality of life. The use of the critical constructivist approach in classrooms can assist students in developing critical thinking, creative thinking, communication, leadership, innovation, problem-solving, decision-making, and active listening skills as it empowers students and puts them in the driving seat through the promotion and motivation of participation and partaking [35].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Graduates, in addition to their hard skills in their majors, are also expected to have developed soft skills that would help them excel in their workplaces. According to AlAfnan [35]; and Hagen and D. Bouchard [36], active listening, communication, collaboration, creativity, critical thinking, leadership, cultural knowledge, innovation, interpersonal relationship management, ethics, professionalism, and problem-solving are the non-technical competencies that are needed to succeed in workplaces these days. Students will be better equipped to analyze problems and give integrated answers in collaborative work by developing this set of soft skills.…”
Section: Sustainable Education and Soft Skills Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…P. 131) rather than a simple subject of study or a conceptually limited idea. Critical discourse analysis was used in several studies to investigate public speeches (AlAfnan, 2022a, 2022b, AlAfnan & Dishari, 2024 and written documents (AlAfnan & Oshchepkova, 2022). It also investigated several linguistics and pragmatic features (AlAfnan, 2024).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be carried out in an ambiguous way by saying something that does not really reflect what the person wants. Brown and Levinson's (1987) politeness theory was used to examine politeness in business writing (AlAfnan, 2014a(AlAfnan, , 2015(AlAfnan, , 2021a, engineering articles (Martinez, 2001), research papers (Getkham, 2014), hedges in medicine (AlAfnan, 2022b, AlAfnan, 2022cFalahati, 2007), university titles (Afful and Akoto, 2010). AlAfnan (2014bAlAfnan ( , 2023 built a theoretical framework to examine workplace emails in an organizational context in Malaysia based on politeness theory.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%