2009
DOI: 10.1093/pasj/61.1.109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Uniting the Quiescent Emission and Burst Spectra of Magnetar Candidates

Abstract: Spectral studies of quiescent emission and bursts of magnetar candidates using XMM-Newton, Chandra and Swift data are presented. Spectra of both the quiescent emission and the bursts for most magnetar candidates are reproduced by a photoelectrically absorbed two blackbody function (2BB). There is a strong correlation between lower and higher temperatures of 2BB (kT LT and kT HT ) for the magnetar candidates of which the spectra are well reproduced by 2BB. In addition, a square of radius for kT LT (R 2 LT ) is … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
42
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
10
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interestingly a similar correlation between the hot and cool BB for AXPs and SGRs has been observed (Nakagawa et al 2009, see their …”
Section: The 2 Blackbodies In Quiescencesupporting
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Interestingly a similar correlation between the hot and cool BB for AXPs and SGRs has been observed (Nakagawa et al 2009, see their …”
Section: The 2 Blackbodies In Quiescencesupporting
confidence: 73%
“…We suggest, the relations in Fig. 6 in Nakagawa et al (2009) can be explained in the context of reprocessing during both quiescence and burst. .…”
Section: Model Features and Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…b Preceding Suzaku studies: SGR 1806−20 (Esposito et al 2007;Nakagawa et al 2009), 1E 1841−45 (Morii et al 2010), SGR 1900+14 (Nakagawa et al 2009) 4U 0142+61 Makishima et al 2014), AX J1818.8−586 (Mereghetti et al 2012), 1E 1547.0−5408 (Enoto et al 2010b;Iwahashi et al 2013;Enoto et al 2012;Makishima et al 2015), SGR 0501+4516 (Enoto et al 2009(Enoto et al , 2010cNakagawa et al 2011) CXOU J164710.2−455216 (Naik et al 2008), SGR 1833−0832 ), Swift J1822.3−1606, and Paper I. c Objects are sorted by the dipole field B d calculated from the period P and its derivativeṖ assuming the magnetic dipole radiation. d Type of observations: PV (Performance Verification phase, i.e., first 9 month after the launch), AO (Announcement of Opportunity observations), ToO (Target of Opportunity observations), and Key (Key Project observations).…”
Section: Reduction Of Broad-band Suzaku Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where we adopted a surface magnetic field strength of B 0 2× 10 15 G (Nakagawa et al 2009). Incidentally, the synchrotron cooling time will decrease in the case of a globally twisted magnetic field (Thompson et al 2002).…”
Section: Synchrotron Cooling Time and Lower Limit To The Size Of The Comentioning
confidence: 99%