2019
DOI: 10.3390/life9010021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unity Makes Strength: A Review on Mutualistic Symbiosis in Representative Insect Clades

Abstract: Settled on the foundations laid by zoologists and embryologists more than a century ago, the study of symbiosis between prokaryotes and eukaryotes is an expanding field. In this review, we present several models of insect–bacteria symbioses that allow for the detangling of most known features of this distinctive way of living, using a combination of very diverse screening approaches, including molecular, microscopic, and genomic techniques. With the increasing the amount of endosymbiotic bacteria genomes avail… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
34
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 135 publications
(178 reference statements)
0
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Insects, however, are not limited to bipartite interactions with single microorganisms as they also harbor and interact with a microbiota comprised of many non-pathogenic and potentially pathogenic bacteria, fungi, viruses, and protozoans (= the holobiont) that can affect the insects’ diet, physiology, immunity, and reproduction. In many cases, beneficial symbionts from the microbiota are essential and have allowed insects to expand and adapt to different environments [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ]. The abundance, tissue specificity, taxa represented, and location (including intra-or extracellular) of these symbionts and the general microbiota is variable among insects, and in many cases depict tight coevolutionary histories [ 5 , 6 , 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Insects, however, are not limited to bipartite interactions with single microorganisms as they also harbor and interact with a microbiota comprised of many non-pathogenic and potentially pathogenic bacteria, fungi, viruses, and protozoans (= the holobiont) that can affect the insects’ diet, physiology, immunity, and reproduction. In many cases, beneficial symbionts from the microbiota are essential and have allowed insects to expand and adapt to different environments [ 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 ]. The abundance, tissue specificity, taxa represented, and location (including intra-or extracellular) of these symbionts and the general microbiota is variable among insects, and in many cases depict tight coevolutionary histories [ 5 , 6 , 7 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, studies of CRISPR diversity can also greatly help in the understanding of evolutionary dynamics of specific bacteria populations [44]. The symbiotic association between eukaryotes and prokaryotes is now recognised as one of the main forces shaping life on our planet [45]. Concerning this, the data presented here supply both a comprehensive characterization of CRISPR-Cas systems in S. marcescens symbionts of RPW and the first comparative analysis of CRISPR loci in S. marcescens .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Douglas, ), but advances are limited by the paucity of genetically amenable systems and culturable symbionts. Arthropods are among the most studied symbiotic hosts, due to their extreme species‐richness, broad distribution and importance as pathogen vectors, but also due to their strong propensity to harbour symbionts (Gil & Latorre, ). Many intracellular mutualists of arthropods play fundamental nutritional roles, supplementing the diets of hosts that feed on unbalanced substrates such as phloem sap or blood (Moran, McCutcheon, & Nakabachi, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…importance as pathogen vectors, but also due to their strong propensity to harbour symbionts (Gil & Latorre, 2019). Many intracellular mutualists of arthropods play fundamental nutritional roles, supplementing the diets of hosts that feed on unbalanced substrates such as phloem sap or blood (Moran, McCutcheon, & Nakabachi, 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%