1974
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.32.438
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Unity of All Elementary-Particle Forces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

38
4,076
4
29

Year Published

2002
2002
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4,513 publications
(4,147 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
38
4,076
4
29
Order By: Relevance
“…We will consider both scenarios. There are two attractive gauge groups for unification in GEMs: SU (3) 3 [32] and SU (5) [33]. Larger groups would generally have too much matter, pushing the gauge couplings strong before the unification scale.…”
Section: Gem Grand Unificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We will consider both scenarios. There are two attractive gauge groups for unification in GEMs: SU (3) 3 [32] and SU (5) [33]. Larger groups would generally have too much matter, pushing the gauge couplings strong before the unification scale.…”
Section: Gem Grand Unificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specific relativistic QFT that turns out to describe nature extremely well, called the Standard Model [2,3,4], is subject to other symmetry principles which will be discussed in the following sections. The other idea that is central to the Standard Model is that of renormalization and will be discussed afterwards.…”
Section: The Standard Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fields in the Lagrangian are written as products of the irreducible representations of these three groups (and of the external group). The SU(3) part corresponds with the strong interactions, and the U(1)×SU (2) corresponds to the electromagnetic and weak nuclear interactions.…”
Section: Gauge Symmetrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…I couldn't help but compare our mess to some truly elegant ideas about unification, which involved more conventional kinds of gauge symmetry, not supersymmetry [2,3]. Those ideas were genuinely fruitful, in that they explained some things we already knew (the relative values of the strong, electromagnetic, and weak coupling constants) [4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%