2017
DOI: 10.1177/1468018116684269
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Universal basic income as development solution?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This unconditionally differentiates other payment programmes that often target specific population groups to meet social or economic objectives. UBI is informed by values of human rights and individual freedom (Lacey 2017 ; Van Parijs 2004 ). This commitment can also be directed to wider poverty alleviation (Lacey 2017 ; Ravallion 2019 ).…”
Section: What Is Universal Basic Income?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This unconditionally differentiates other payment programmes that often target specific population groups to meet social or economic objectives. UBI is informed by values of human rights and individual freedom (Lacey 2017 ; Van Parijs 2004 ). This commitment can also be directed to wider poverty alleviation (Lacey 2017 ; Ravallion 2019 ).…”
Section: What Is Universal Basic Income?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Progressive taxation can also provide funding for some sort of direct and indirect redistribution of wealth such as expanded Conditional Cash Transfer/4Ps scheme and universal basic income—which, despite their limitations, are generally seen as redistributive programs. In the case of universal basic income, Lacey (2017) speaks of a “growing body of evidence of the effectiveness of UBI programmes” which need “to be deployed as part of a range of counter-poverty initiatives that take into account the wider social and economic context…”…”
Section: Wage Hikes and Tax Reform For Income And Wealth Redistributionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He draws focus on how to tackle labour market/employment and poverty issues while transforming into UBI and how to implement the UBI principals in order to constrain the misusage risks given. Lacey (2017) provides some thesis and anti-thesis remarks from both sides of the UBI debate, providing some experimental results from Finland and Namibia, and ongoing application examples from Iran and Alaska. It is emphasized that UBI is gathering some significant support and the UBI supporters are gathering empirical evidence to support their side, showing UBI as a legitimate tool to tackle gender-based and/or race-based issues in addition to wealth distribution.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%