2016
DOI: 10.1109/jqe.2016.2573959
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Universal Behavior of Atomistic Strain in Self-Assembled Quantum Dots

Abstract: Self-assembled quantum dots (QDs) are highly strained heterostructures. the lattice strain significantly modifies the electronic and optical properties of these devices. A universal behavior is observed in atomistic strain simulations (in terms of both strain magnitude and profile) of QDs with different shapes and materials. In this paper, this universal behavior is investigated by atomistic as well as analytic continuum models. Atomistic strain simulations are very accurate but computationally expensive. On t… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The magnitude of the biaxial strain increases with increasing diameter and decreases with increasing height, while the magnitude of the hydrostatic strain changes slightly in the direction opposite to the biaxial strain. Increasing the height is equivalent to the decreasing diameter in terms of changing the strain in the quantum dot since it depends almost entirely on the aspect ratio not on the individual dimensions [ 39 ]. Increasing the diameter reduces the energy gap, which further reduces the optical transition energy, while increasing the height increases the energy gap, which works against the reduction in confinement energy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnitude of the biaxial strain increases with increasing diameter and decreases with increasing height, while the magnitude of the hydrostatic strain changes slightly in the direction opposite to the biaxial strain. Increasing the height is equivalent to the decreasing diameter in terms of changing the strain in the quantum dot since it depends almost entirely on the aspect ratio not on the individual dimensions [ 39 ]. Increasing the diameter reduces the energy gap, which further reduces the optical transition energy, while increasing the height increases the energy gap, which works against the reduction in confinement energy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…m* is the carrier’s effective mass, ћ is the reduced Planck constant, is the three-dimensional coordinate vector, and V is the carrier’s confinement potential (band discontinuity). To simplify the calculation procedure of the QD electronic structure, we have adopted the constant strain approximation [26, 27] instead of the computationally expensive atomic simulation approach that obviously could give more precision in the strain distribution profile [28, 29]. Indeed, we consider the carriers confining potential in the compressively strained QD to be sufficiently deep to minimize the impact of the strain non-uniformity on the electron confined states [27].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assuming the growth direction is [001], the strain components ii inside the quantum well are given by [33] ε xx = ε yy = a Substrate − a well a well ,…”
Section: Appendix A: Strain and Polarizationmentioning
confidence: 99%