2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalgebra.2010.12.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Universal deformation formulas and braided module algebras

Abstract: We study formal deformations of a crossed product S(V )# f G, of a polynomial algebra with a group, induced from a universal deformation formula introduced by Witherspoon. These deformations arise from braided actions of Hopf algebras generated by automorphisms and skew derivations. We show that they are non-trivial in the characteristic free context, even if G is infinite, by showing that their infinitesimals are not coboundaries. For this we construct a new complex which computes the Hochschild cohomology of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Theorem 4.6.1, for the notions see Sect. 4.6), generalizing the corresponding results in [7,20,21,24].…”
Section: Theorem a U Is A Pbw Deformation Of B If And Only If θ Is Ansupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Theorem 4.6.1, for the notions see Sect. 4.6), generalizing the corresponding results in [7,20,21,24].…”
Section: Theorem a U Is A Pbw Deformation Of B If And Only If θ Is Ansupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The question that naturally arises is what about skew derivations. The answer is that sometimes skew derivations do lead to a deformation via a Hopf algebra action, as shown in [12] and [20] for the case of S(V )#G. The work presented here generalizes these results to the quantum version, that is to the case of S q (V )#G. This is particularly relevant since explicit examples of deformations of S q (V )#G have proven to be difficult to find. Moreover, it turns out that some of the deformations constructed in this work are not graded in the sense of Braverman and Gaitsgory [2] (see Remark 3.10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Remark 4.7. This result was obtained for the case of S(V )#G in [12]. Thus, Theorem 4.5 is a generalization of [12, Theorem 3.5] to S q (V )#G with α being the identity map on S q (V )#G, s the twist map, χ α (g) = 1 and χ ς (g) = χ 1 (g −1 ) for all g ∈ G.…”
Section: E)mentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We will look more closely at the Hochschild 2-cocycle condition (3.4) and the obstructions (3.5) and (3.6) in the case that A is a group twisted Koszul algebra S ⋊ G. A convenient resolution for this purpose was introduced by Guccione, Guccione, and Valqui [8]. We now recall from [13] a modified version of this construction.…”
Section: Hochschild Cohomology Of Group Twisted Koszul Algebrasmentioning
confidence: 99%