2021
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.126.085502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Universal Density of Low-Frequency States in Amorphous Solids at Finite Temperatures

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, the KHGPS Hamiltonian in Eq. (1) appears to offer a relatively simple model for the emergence of the universal D(ω) ∼ ω 4 nonphononic spectra, previously observed in finite-dimensional, particle-based computer glass-formers [10][11][12][13][14][15]18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As such, the KHGPS Hamiltonian in Eq. (1) appears to offer a relatively simple model for the emergence of the universal D(ω) ∼ ω 4 nonphononic spectra, previously observed in finite-dimensional, particle-based computer glass-formers [10][11][12][13][14][15]18].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…1a) emerge from self-organized glassy frustration [8], which is generic to structural glasses quenched from a melt [9]. Their associated frequencies ω have been shown [10][11][12] to follow a universal nonphononic (non-Debye) density of states D(ω)∼ω 4 as ω→0, independently of microscopic details [13,14], spatial dimension [15,16] and formation history [17,18]. Some examples for D(ω), obtained in computer glasses, are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main difference with respect to colloidal glasses is that, for molecular glasses, the spin glass susceptibility mildly changes upon decreasing temperature, something that has been interpreted as a signature of the absence of the Gardner transition. This goes along with the fact that soft spheres models display a density of states (DOS) that has a higher pseudogap, D(ω) ∼ ω 4 , [20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27] with respect to what is predicted by mean field theory in a typical Gardner phase where D(ω) ∼ ω 2 [28]. As a consequence, the spin glass susceptibility extracted from the harmonic density of states is finite.…”
Section: Introduction -mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…1a) emerge from self-organized glassy frustration [8], which is generic to structural glasses quenched from a melt [9]. Their associated frequencies ω have been shown [10][11][12] to follow a universal nonphononic (non-Debye) density of states D(ω) ∼ ω 4 as ω → 0, independently of microscopic details [13,14], spatial dimension [15,16] and formation history [17,18]. Some examples for D(ω), obtained in computer glasses, are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%