Universal Design Mobile Interface Guidelines (UDMIG) for an Aging Population

Ruzic, Ljilja; Sanfod, Jon A.

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-60672-9_2

Cited by 12 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Particular emphasis is given to the involvement and elicitation of stakeholders, either those directly or indirectly implicated by technology design. Approaches such as universal design [39], inclusive design [40], sustainable design [41], participatory design [42], and values sensitive design [43][44][45], among others have been theorized; Value Sensitive Design (VSD) becoming one of the most popular approaches over the last 20 years [46]. Emerging from the field of human-computer interaction, VSD is precisely predicated on the same premise that technology is not value-neutral, rather it is sensitive to stakeholder values, whether they are direct stakeholders such as users and designers or indirect such as industry CEO's, governments, and the biosphere at large [35,47].…”

Section: Value Sensitive Design In the Industry 50 Eramentioning

confidence: 99%

Value-Oriented and Ethical Technology Engineering in Industry 5.0: A Human-Centric Perspective for the Design of the Factory of the Future

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although manufacturing companies are currently situated at a transition point in what has been called Industry 4.0, a new revolutionary wave—Industry 5.0—is emerging as an ‘Age of Augmentation’ when the human and machine reconcile and work in perfect symbiosis with one another. Recent years have indeed assisted in drawing attention to the human-centric design of Cyber-Physical Production Systems (CPPS) and to the genesis of the ‘Operator 4.0’, two novel concepts that raise significant ethical questions regarding the impact of technology on workers and society at large. This paper argues that a value-oriented and ethical technology engineering in Industry 5.0 is an urgent and sensitive topic as demonstrated by a survey administered to industry leaders from different companies. The Value Sensitive Design (VSD) approach is proposed as a principled framework to illustrate how technologies enabling human–machine symbiosis in the Factory of the Future can be designed to embody elicited human values and to illustrate actionable steps that engineers and designers can take in their design projects. Use cases based on real solutions and prototypes discuss how a design-for-values approach aids in the investigation and mitigation of ethical issues emerging from the implementation of technological solutions and, hence, support the migration to a symbiotic Factory of the Future.

show abstract

Section: Value Sensitive Design In the Industry 50 Eramentioning

confidence: 99%

Value-Oriented and Ethical Technology Engineering in Industry 5.0: A Human-Centric Perspective for the Design of the Factory of the Future

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Other design approaches within HCI were adapted concurrently with information and communication technologies (ICT), each of which prioritised different methodological tools or procedures. Examples include universal design, inclusive design, participatory design, and worth-centred computing among others [29][30][31][32]. Among existing frameworks as well as others that have not be attributed proper names, some scholars [33][34][35] have argued that the VSD approach is the most encompassing.…”

Section: Value Sensitive Designmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Ecological Turn in Design: Adopting a Posthumanist Ethics to Inform Value Sensitive Design

Umbrello

2021

Philosophies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Design for Values (DfV) philosophies are a series of design approaches that aim to incorporate human values into the early phases of technological design to direct innovation into beneficial outcomes. The difficulty and necessity of directing advantageous futures for transformative technologies through the application and adoption of value-based design approaches are apparent. However, questions of whose values to design are of critical importance. DfV philosophies typically aim to enrol the stakeholders who may be affected by the emergence of such a technology. However, regardless of which design approach is adopted, all enrolled stakeholders are human ones who propose human values. Contemporary scholarship on metahumanisms, particularly those on posthumanism, have decentred the human from its traditionally privileged position among other forms of life. Arguments that the humanist position is not (and has never been) tenable are persuasive. As such, scholarship has begun to provide a more encompassing ontology for the investigation of nonhuman values. Given the potentially transformative nature of future technologies as relates to the earth and its many assemblages, it is clear that the value investigations of these design approaches fail to account for all relevant stakeholders (i.e., nonhuman animals). This paper has two primary objectives: (1) to argue for the cogency of a posthuman ethics in the design of technologies; and (2) to describe how existing DfV approaches can begin to envision principled and methodological ways of incorporating non-human values into design. To do this, the paper provides a rudimentary outline of what constitutes DfV approaches. It then takes up a unique design approach called Value Sensitive Design (VSD) as an illustrative example. Out of all the other DfV frameworks, VSD most clearly illustrates a principled approach to the integration of values in design.

show abstract

“…From those concepts several principles, guidelines, heuristics and standards were developed [8,9,10]. However, those approaches are sometimes not sufficiently complete to meet usability needs of specific users [4]. They might even be contradictory [13].…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…universal design [2]) and usability (e.g. universal usability [3,7]) issues persist [4]. According to Meiselwitz et al [5] the challenges to achieve universal usability are associated to gap in users' knowledge and both technological and user diversity.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Graphical User Interface Redefinition Addressing Users’ Diversity

Silva

2018

Human-Centered Software Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Improvements can still be made in the development of Interactive Computing Systems (ICSs) aiming to ease their use. This is particularly true when trying to address users' diversity. Most ICSs do not adjust themselves to the user nor consider user's particularities. However, some provide solutions to address better specificities of expert and novice users. Others adjust themselves based on user's interaction history, but this does not always lead to improvements in use. An aspect that prevents to address users' diversity broadly is the fact that most of existing ICSs do not provide source code access. This means that only owners can introduce improvements on them. This paper proposes an approach (based on both affective computing and computer vision) to broadly improve design for diversity (without source code access) for both existing and to be developed ICSs. The results are twofold: i) example of an initial set of design guidelines; ii) opens the way to runtime Graphical User Interface (GUI) redefinition and adjustment based on both user's features and emotions reducing therefore designers' restrictions when addressing users' diversity.

show abstract

Universal Design Mobile Interface Guidelines (UDMIG) for an Aging Population

Cited by 12 publications

References 29 publications

Value-Oriented and Ethical Technology Engineering in Industry 5.0: A Human-Centric Perspective for the Design of the Factory of the Future

Value-Oriented and Ethical Technology Engineering in Industry 5.0: A Human-Centric Perspective for the Design of the Factory of the Future

The Ecological Turn in Design: Adopting a Posthumanist Ethics to Inform Value Sensitive Design

Graphical User Interface Redefinition Addressing Users’ Diversity

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About