2019
DOI: 10.1093/geroni/igz038.2122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Universal Family Care: Decision Points for States in Improving the Care Infrastructure Through Social Insurance

Abstract: This report presents policy options for a new social insurance program – akin to Social Security or Medicare – that would provide an integrated approach to protecting against the risk of needing to provide or receive care across the lifespan: Universal Family Care. The program would allow individuals and families to access caregiving supports at various points throughout the life course, from the arrival of a child to end-of-life care for a family member or oneself. The program covers three specific caregiving… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…How would elders pay for the first years of needing supportive care? We could save through our working years, we could have large and well‐financed families willing and able to be of help, our communities and organizations could pitch in (as Washington state has done with $36,500 of first‐dollar coverage for workers in that state (Veghte, Bradley, Cohen, & Hartmann, 2019, p. 190), and we could buy long‐term care insurance privately that reflects our situation and willingness to take risks. Insurance companies, freed of the risks of very long durations of long‐term care, would offer a variety of coverage packages to individuals, companies, and organizations to precede and wrap around the government's catastrophic coverage.…”
Section: Reforms That Require a Decade Or Morementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…How would elders pay for the first years of needing supportive care? We could save through our working years, we could have large and well‐financed families willing and able to be of help, our communities and organizations could pitch in (as Washington state has done with $36,500 of first‐dollar coverage for workers in that state (Veghte, Bradley, Cohen, & Hartmann, 2019, p. 190), and we could buy long‐term care insurance privately that reflects our situation and willingness to take risks. Insurance companies, freed of the risks of very long durations of long‐term care, would offer a variety of coverage packages to individuals, companies, and organizations to precede and wrap around the government's catastrophic coverage.…”
Section: Reforms That Require a Decade Or Morementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach would greatly reduce the number of elderly who spend-down to Medicaid, thus reducing the pressure on Medicaid. Liberal and conservative think tanks alike have suggested frameworks similar to the proposed structure (Calmus, 2013;Veghte, Bradley, Cohen, & Hartmann, 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%