2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01275.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Universal foliage‐stem scaling across environments and species in dicot trees: plasticity, biomechanics and Corner’s Rules

Abstract: Trees range from small-leaved, intricately branched species with slender stems to large-leaved, coarsely branched ones with thick stems. We suggest a mechanism for this pattern, known as Corner's Rules, based on universal scaling. We show similar crown area-stem diameter scaling between trunks and branches, environments, and species spanning a wide range of leaf size and stem biomechanics. If crown and stem maintain metabolically driven proportionality, but similar amounts of photosynthates are produced per un… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
83
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
6
83
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, some combinations are possible but usually not favored by selection. For example, plants with dense wood usually bear small leaves but plants with low-density wood bear large ones (Olson et al, 2009). Presumably the combination of high density wood and very large leaves is one not generally favored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, some combinations are possible but usually not favored by selection. For example, plants with dense wood usually bear small leaves but plants with low-density wood bear large ones (Olson et al, 2009). Presumably the combination of high density wood and very large leaves is one not generally favored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Independent of the multiple forms expressed by plants, several leading dimensions of trait covariation have been documented (Ackerly and Donoghue 1998; Enquist 2002; Niklas and Enquist 2002; Westoby et al 2002; Wright et al 2004; Olson et al 2009; Diaz et al 2016). These apparently highly homoplasious patterns of trait variation appear to span most flowering plant lineages given that they are observed across species and across habitats.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These apparently highly homoplasious patterns of trait variation appear to span most flowering plant lineages given that they are observed across species and across habitats. One of the best documented of these relationships is the ‘leaf size-twig size’ spectrum (Ackerly and Donoghue 1998; Cornelissen 1999; Westoby et al 2002; Westoby and Wright 2003; Sun et al 2006; Wright et al 2007; Olson et al 2009), which includes ‘Corner's Rules’ (Corner 1949). The leaf size-twig size spectrum includes the tendency for plants with large leaves to have predictably thick twigs made up of tissues with low specific density (Wright et al 2006; Swenson and Enquist 2008; Olson et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These plastic responses represent alternative root-climbing strategies that are potentially optimized for different climbing substrates and environmental conditions. One aspect of phenotypic plasticity is phenotypic accommodation which produces a buffering effect maintaining critical relationships among varying components and lessening the negative effects of change [43,44]. Evidence for phenotypic accommodation in morphological, hydraulic and mechanical stem traits has been provided in previous studies on woody plants [43,45,46].…”
Section: Can We Assume Growth Form Plasticity Inmentioning
confidence: 99%