Universal health coverage from multiple perspectives: a synthesis of conceptual literature and global debates

Abstract

BackgroundThere is an emerging global consensus on the importance of universal health coverage (UHC), but no unanimity on the conceptual definition and scope of UHC, whether UHC is achievable or not, how to move towards it, common indicators for measuring its progress, and its long-term sustainability. This has resulted in various interpretations of the concept, emanating from different disciplinary perspectives. This paper discusses the various dimensions of UHC emerging from these interpretations and argues for the need to pay attention to the complex interactions across the various components of a health system in the pursuit of UHC as a legal human rights issue.DiscussionThe literature presents UHC as a multi-dimensional concept, operationalized in terms of universal population coverage, universal financial protection, and universal access to quality health care, anchored on the basis of health care as an international legal obligation grounded in international human rights laws. As a legal concept, UHC implies the existence of a legal framework that mandates national governments to provide health care to all residents while compelling the international community to support poor nations in implementing this right. As a humanitarian social concept, UHC aims at achieving universal population coverage by enrolling all residents into health-related social security systems and securing equitable entitlements to the benefits from the health system for all. As a health economics concept, UHC guarantees financial protection by providing a shield against the catastrophic and impoverishing consequences of out-of-pocket expenditure, through the implementation of pooled prepaid financing systems. As a public health concept, UHC has attracted several controversies regarding which services should be covered: comprehensive services vs. minimum basic package, and priority disease-specific interventions vs. primary health care.SummaryAs a multi-dimensional concept, grounded in international human rights laws, the move towards UHC in LMICs requires all states to effectively recognize the right to health in their national constitutions. It also requires a human rights-focused integrated approach to health service delivery that recognizes the health system as a complex phenomenon with interlinked functional units whose effective interaction are essential to reach the equilibrium called UHC.

Sex Differences in Dementia Primary Care Performance and Health Service Use: A Population‐Based Study

“…The observed similarities in our study may reflect greater homogeneity in the disease management needs and healthcare utilization in the year following diagnosis than in later stages of the disease . Availability of universal healthcare in Canada may have also facilitated equal opportunity to accessing care …”

Revision surgery rates in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: meta‐analysis of risk factors

“…Another factor that could influence these regional differences in rates is health‐care systems. European and Asian counties, which showed the lowest rates of revision surgery in the current study, are also the most likely to have socialized health‐care systems, which may be associated with surgical restrictions or longer surgical wait times . Another inherent bias is direct financial benefit to the surgeon in countries such as the United States, when multiple revision surgeries are performed.…”

“…European and Asian counties, which showed the lowest rates of revision surgery in the current study, are also the most likely to have socialized health-care systems, which may be associated with surgical restrictions or longer surgical wait times. 58 Another inherent bias is direct financial benefit to the surgeon in countries such as the United States, when multiple revision surgeries are performed. Patients with access to free or subsidized health care may also have higher levels of compliance with follow-up visits and medication usage, and thus have lower rates of uncontrolled persistent disease necessitating revision surgery.…”

Assessing the universal health coverage target in the Sustainable Development Goals from a human rights perspective

“…UHC has been identified as potentially the third global health transition, the first being public health improvements such as basic sewage and sanitation and the second, the epidemiological transition that reduced the toll of communicable diseases [1]. Major health and development organizations, including the World Health Organization, the World Bank Group, the Rockefeller Foundation, Oxfam, the Gates Foundation, the International Labour Organization, and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), have endorsed initiatives promoting UHC [2]. Dr. Margaret Chan, the World Health Organization (WHO) Director General, has described universal health coverage as the single most powerful concept that public health has to offer [3].…”