2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2104.11123
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Universal Horn Sentences and the Joint Embedding Property

Abstract: The finite models of a universal sentence Φ are the age of a structure if and only if Φ has the joint embedding property. We prove that the computational problem whether a given universal sentence Φ has the joint embedding property is undecidable, even if Φ is additionally Horn and the signature is binary.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, in [3] Braunfeld has shown that this question is undecidable for hereditary classes of graphs defined by finitely many forbidden induced subgraphs. One more undecidability result appeared in [2], where Bodirsky et al have shown that the joint embedding property is undecidable for the class of all finite models of a given universal Horn sentence. On the other hand, several positive results have been obtained by McDevitt and Ruškuc in [9], where the authors studied classes of words and permutations closed under taking consecutive subwords, also known as factors, and consecutive subpermutations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, in [3] Braunfeld has shown that this question is undecidable for hereditary classes of graphs defined by finitely many forbidden induced subgraphs. One more undecidability result appeared in [2], where Bodirsky et al have shown that the joint embedding property is undecidable for the class of all finite models of a given universal Horn sentence. On the other hand, several positive results have been obtained by McDevitt and Ruškuc in [9], where the authors studied classes of words and permutations closed under taking consecutive subwords, also known as factors, and consecutive subpermutations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%