2013
DOI: 10.1088/1751-8113/46/26/262001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

UniversalK-matrix distribution in β = 2 ensembles of random matrices

Abstract: The K−matrix, also known as the "Wigner reaction matrix" in nuclear scattering or "impedance matrix" in the electromagnetic wave scattering, is given essentially by an M × M diagonal block of the resolvent (E − H) −1 of a Hamiltonian H. For chaotic quantum systems the Hamiltonian H can be modelled by random Hermitian N × N matrices taken from invariant ensembles with the Dyson symmetry index β = 1, 2 or 4. For β = 2 we prove by explicit calculation a universality conjecture by P. Brouwer (Phys. Rev. B 51 (1995… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the universal properties depend only on the invariance properties of the underlying Hamiltonian [64][65][66], his result established the equivalence between the two approaches. Furthermore, very recently Fyodorov et al have demonstrated this equivalence for a broad class of unitary-invariant ensembles of random matrices [68].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Since the universal properties depend only on the invariance properties of the underlying Hamiltonian [64][65][66], his result established the equivalence between the two approaches. Furthermore, very recently Fyodorov et al have demonstrated this equivalence for a broad class of unitary-invariant ensembles of random matrices [68].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…A similar formula for invariant ensembles of complex Hermitian random matrices H ( i.e. β = 2) was proved rigorously very recently in [18], and in the same paper it was mentioned that for β = 1 and the case of random Gaussian coupling the following relation holds §:…”
Section: Motivations and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…• As it has been mentioned above, we were not yet able to reveal nice mathematical structures for (1) at finite values of the matrix size N beyond the simplest case K = 1, L = 1, where the methods outlined below yielded a determinantal structure § The corresponding formula in [18] was written not accurately enough and did not show the dependence on sgn det factors.…”
Section: Motivations and Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, gap probabilities related to the smallest and largest eigenvalue were found to possess a representation as averaged products of determinants in the denominator to half integer power [17]. Other examples are the eigenvalue density in the ordinary and doubly correlated Wishart model [18][19][20][21], the distribution of the smallest eigenvalue [22][23][24][25] as well as universality considerations in scattering theory [26,27]. Those square roots are serious obstacles in analytical calculations and a solution is urgently called for.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%