2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejc.2004.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Universal partial order represented by means of oriented trees and other simple graphs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
39
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It is a well-known fact that the homomorphism order of (loopless) directed graphs is universal (see [20]; see also Hubička and Nešetřil's [11] simpler proof). The claim then follows from Propositions 3.1 and 3.3.…”
Section: Proposition 32 Let G Be a Graph Then P G Is A Core If Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a well-known fact that the homomorphism order of (loopless) directed graphs is universal (see [20]; see also Hubička and Nešetřil's [11] simpler proof). The claim then follows from Propositions 3.1 and 3.3.…”
Section: Proposition 32 Let G Be a Graph Then P G Is A Core If Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known (Corollary 3.11, [28]) that there are only two finite maximal antichains, both of size one, in G. The study of infinite antichains in G has centred around the notion of splitting (see for example [21]). The homomorphism order has been shown to be universal on various other classes of structures: digraphs ( [58], oriented paths and trees ( [33]), partial orders and lattices ( [47]). Locally constrained graph homomorphisms -i.e.…”
Section: Homomorphisms: Embeddings and Epimorphismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However note that here the key property is that objects are not connected and contains odd cycles of unbounded length. If we want to obtain connected graphs with bounded cycles then we have to refer to [4,13,5] where it is proved that that the class of finite oriented trees T and even the class of finite oriented paths form universal partial orders. These strong notions are not needed in this paper.…”
Section: Representing Divisibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%