2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-00416-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Universal patterns of long-distance commuting and social assortativity in cities

Abstract: Millions commute to work every day in cities and interact with colleagues, partners, friends, and strangers. Commuting facilitates the mixing of people from distant and diverse neighborhoods, but whether this has an imprint on social inclusion or instead, connections remain assortative is less explored. In this paper, we aim to better understand income sorting in social networks inside cities and investigate how commuting distance conditions the online social ties of Twitter users in the 50 largest metropolita… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
3
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fraction of workers who have their homes in the same district is very close to the census data in the outer districts (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23) but generally overestimated in the core districts (1, 5-9) and the inner districts (2)(3)(4)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14). The workers from other district groups show the best match to the census data (where the CDR should have the best quality), while the agglomeration is somewhat overestimated in many districts.…”
Section: Validation By Censussupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The fraction of workers who have their homes in the same district is very close to the census data in the outer districts (15)(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23) but generally overestimated in the core districts (1, 5-9) and the inner districts (2)(3)(4)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14). The workers from other district groups show the best match to the census data (where the CDR should have the best quality), while the agglomeration is somewhat overestimated in many districts.…”
Section: Validation By Censussupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Since these locations fundamentally determine the people's mobility customs, the commuting trends can be analyzed between these locations. The commuting is studied, using mobile network data, within a city [7,8], or between cities [9][10][11], and also examined by social network data, such as Twitter [12,13].…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we have discussed, signatures of segregation can be associated to strong diagonal elements in these matrices, indicating that people of a given SES are the most likely to visit places associated with the same or similar SES, as compared to random visiting patterns. To quantify the strength of diagonal concentration of visiting probabilities, we measure the diagonality index of the normalised stratification matrices [46], which is similar to the assortativity coefficient used by others [5,47]. It is defined as the Pearson correlation coefficient of matrix entries as…”
Section: Mobility Mixing and Segregated Residencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature on contact patterns across socioeconomic groups is limited. However, it is known that workplace and housing environments differ for low and high SES [74,75], SES groups tend to have more mobility within-group than outside of their group [9,76], and low SES groups have not been as able to reduce their mobility during the pandemic (e.g. [2,10]).…”
Section: Mechanistic Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%