2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Universal Pensions for Developing Countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
86
0
15

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(101 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
86
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Different modes of the pension system in each country determine different replacement rates and contribution rates [14][15][16]. In 1997, when China established a pension scheme for urban workers, the expected replacement rate was 58.5 percent, whereas the contribution rate was 20 percent.…”
Section: Determination Of Reasonable Intervals For the Replacement Ramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different modes of the pension system in each country determine different replacement rates and contribution rates [14][15][16]. In 1997, when China established a pension scheme for urban workers, the expected replacement rate was 58.5 percent, whereas the contribution rate was 20 percent.…”
Section: Determination Of Reasonable Intervals For the Replacement Ramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, social assistance programmes are also common to many MDCs, and their introduction seems to have responded more to a social agenda (Willmore 2007) than to mineral revenue availability. In some cases, for example, Bolivia and Nigeria, an additional inflow of revenue (whether from the mineral sectors as in Nigeria or from privatization revenues in the 1990s and more recently, from re-nationalization and new taxes levied on the hydrocarbon industry as in Bolivia) has helped the implementation of the respective government's social programmes.…”
Section: Social Policy Initiatives In Mdcsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be acknowledged, however, that the achieved coverage of existing UCP arrangements in low income countries is uneven, ranging from 77 percent in Nepal to a recorded 105 percent in Bolivia [23]. Above all, the evidence suggests that their capacity to address unmet need satisfactorily is variable.…”
Section: Programme Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Above all, the evidence suggests that their capacity to address unmet need satisfactorily is variable. According to Willmore's recent study [23], none of these first pillar pension arrangements could be described as "generous", but entitlements in Mauritius and Namibia-currently 16 percent of per capita GDP-are sufficient "to ensure that few experience extreme poverty or deprivation in old age". In contrast, entitlements under the first pillar in Nepal and Mexico Cityapproximately 10 percent of per capita GDP-"are clearly inadequate" (p. 11).…”
Section: Programme Designmentioning
confidence: 99%