Universal Quantum Computing: Third Gen Prototyping Utilizing Relativistic ‘Trivector’ R-Qubit Modeling Surmounting Uncertainty

Abstract

We postulate bulk universal quantum computing (QC) cannot be achieved without surmounting the quantum uncertainty principle, an inherent barrier by empirical definition in the regime described by the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum theory-the last remaining hurdle to bulk QC. To surmount uncertainty with probability 1, we redefine the basis for the qubit utilizing a unique form of M-Theoretic Calabi-Yau mirror symmetry cast in an LSXD Dirac covariant polarized vacuum with an inherent 'Feynman synchronization backbone'. This also incorporates a relativistic qubit (r-qubit) providing additional degrees of freedom beyond the traditional Block 2-sphere qubit bringing the r-qubit into correspondence with our version of Relativistic Topological Quantum Field Theory (RTQFT). We present a 3 rd generation prototype design for simplifying bulk QC implementation.

‘Shut The Front Door!’: Obviating the Challenge of Large-Scale Extra Dimensions and Psychophysical Bridging

“…A wrinkle in atomic spectra may not initially appear as an appropriate crack in the 'cosmic egg' -meaning a door to empirically demonstrating the 1 st indicia of the existence of Cartesian Interactive Dualism. To clarify, NFT [7][8][9][10][11][12][13] now has sufficiently firm theoretical grounds to declare that the Planck scale is 'not the basement of reality', albeit it is an oasis between the 1 st and 3 rd regimes of reality -a nilpotent boundary of the infinite potentia [5][6][7] hidden behind it or domain wall forming the virtual reality perceived by the Euclidean/ Minkowski observer. Just as the quantum regime was until recently invisible to the empirical tools of Newtonian or Classical Mechanics, so until now Unified Field Mechanics, U F has remained invisible to the tools of quantum mechanics primarily because of the barrier associated with the uncertainty principle.…”

“…The uncertainty principle has been empirically demonstrated by the Stern-Gerlach experiment [14] where a continuous non-uniform em-field arbitrarily projected along the z-axis produces 'spacequantization' and by definition the quantum uncertainty principle under the auspices of the Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Theory. The simple solution to surmount uncertainty is to 'do something else' [6,8,15] which will only be given brief conceptual delineation here. The experiment to be presented revolves around an as yet obscure work by Vigier called 'tight bound states' (TBS) in the hydrogen atom [9,17].…”

“…Figure 8 illustrates a nilpotent continuous-state regime cycling from a 12D dodecahedral de Sitter space [38] through an intermediate Calabi-Yau mirror symmetry to a virtual 'standing-wave' nilpotent 3D Euclidean space resultant. We extend Vigier's original model of TBS in hydrogen [17] to include a unique 12D M-Theoretic perspective [8] with a Calabi-Yau : Dodecahedral involute mirror symmetry [6] in Continuous-State HD space [8,11] elevating Cramer's Transactional model [22] and wave-particle duality to principles of cosmology. The 4-Space nilpotent resultant of the E3/M4 virtual present which is a standing-wave of the future-past is shown in Figs.…”

“…Bulk Universal QC can be achieved by superseding the quantum uncertainty principle. (see [6] for details) Programming and data I/O are performed without decoherence by utilizing the inherent conformal scale-invariant mirror symmetry properties that act like a 'synchronization backbone' [6,8] whereby the local quantum state is causally free (measureable without decoherence) at a specific HD node in the continuous-state conformal symmetry cycle. 3.…”

“…Although the mathematics of Rowlands avantgarde nilpotent physics works brilliantly in extending our understanding of the nature of a fermionic singularity (as yet an open question in physics), for Noetic Field Theory (NFT): The quantization of Mind, for which Rowland's model has recently even become a basis for solidifying NFT's foundation [6,7]; elegant math is not necessarily tantamount to physics. The nature of the so-called fermionic singularity is profoundly unique in NFT; and even though the protocol introduced here would not work without that noetic nature being physically realistic, its technical description is beyond the scope of this paper [8][9][10] within which we outline the experiment and only delineate a minimum of associated parameters to help explain its radical theoretical foundations.…”