2009
DOI: 10.1038/nphys1424
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Universal quantum control of two-electron spin quantum bits using dynamic nuclear polarization

Abstract: . 2009. Universal quantum control of two-electron spin quantum bits using dynamic nuclear polarization. Nature Physics 5(12): 903-908.Published Version

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

9
614
2
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 422 publications
(626 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
9
614
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We choose the inter-dot distance to be 40 nm in order to have distinct dots that still have appreciable tunnel coupling and exchange. This is a smaller interdot distance than is typical for experiments, [3][4][5] but that is simply because the dots themselves are smaller here. The qualitative behavior should be similar.…”
Section: B Parameter Choicesmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We choose the inter-dot distance to be 40 nm in order to have distinct dots that still have appreciable tunnel coupling and exchange. This is a smaller interdot distance than is typical for experiments, [3][4][5] but that is simply because the dots themselves are smaller here. The qualitative behavior should be similar.…”
Section: B Parameter Choicesmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…2,3 Recent experiments have made tremendous advances along these lines, demonstrating single-qubit initialization, arbitrary manipulation, and single-shot readout, all within a fraction of the coherence time of the qubit. [3][4][5][6][7] Preliminary steps toward an entangling two-qubit gate have also been reported. 8 In principle, successful completion of that program leaves the (admittedly enormous) challenge of scaling up to large numbers of qubits as the last remaining hurdle in the fabrication of a practical quantum computer.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4] In GaAs-based qubits, which are the state of the art, the essential gate operations 1, 5,6 for quantum computation 7,8 have been demonstrated. [9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] But GaAs possesses a serious handicap for coherent spin manipulations-the nuclear spins. 19,20 Controlling this source of decoherence is of major interest and an active field of research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19,20 Controlling this source of decoherence is of major interest and an active field of research. 18,[21][22][23][24][25][26] Alternatives to III-V semiconductors with inherent nuclear spins are systems composed of atoms without nuclear magnetic moments, such as Si and C. [27][28][29] Natural silicon consists of three isotopes: 28 Si (92.2%), 29 Si (4.7%), and 30 Si (3.1%). 30 Hereof only 29 Si has nonzero nuclear spin (I = 1/2), and purification can further reduce its abundance down to 0.05%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A high quality two-dimensional electron gas is induced by a field-effect and is tunable over a wide range of density. Device design, fabrication, and low temperature (T= 0.3K) transport data are reported.Nanostructures such as quantum point contacts and quantum dots fabricated on modulation-doped AlGaAs/GaAs heterostructures are widely used to explore nanoscale electron transport and are utilized extensively in spin-based approaches to quantum computing [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8]. Modulation-doped GaAs/AlGaAs heterostructures possess several desirable attributes including very high mobility of the underlying two-dimensional electron gas (2DEG) and the relative ease of nanostructure fabrication.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%