1995
DOI: 10.1016/0165-5876(95)01165-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Universal screening for infant hearing impairment: simple, beneficial, and presently justified

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies thereafter suggested that up to 50% of all the children with congenital hearing loss have no risk factors and would be missed by screening only those at high risk [6][7][8][9]. Universal Screening of all infants for hearing loss within the fi rst few months of life hence became the accepted strategy [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several studies thereafter suggested that up to 50% of all the children with congenital hearing loss have no risk factors and would be missed by screening only those at high risk [6][7][8][9]. Universal Screening of all infants for hearing loss within the fi rst few months of life hence became the accepted strategy [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevalence of hearing loss in infants is more than twice that of other screened newborn disorders like congenital hypothyroidism and phenylketonuria [6]. In addition, 50% of children with moderate to profound congenital hearing loss exhibit no risk factors for hearing loss [6][7][8][9][10]. Early detection followed by appropriate treatment provides the best chance for maximizing the critical period of hearing, to avail of the resources to improve hearing and oral communication skills.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“….there is little evidence to support the routine universal screening for all neonates." Although the conclusions of Bess and Paradise and others who urged caution for the implementation of newborn hearing screening were widely criticized [e.g., White and Maxon, 1995], the fact is that there was very little research from large, systematically-implemented universal newborn hearing screening programs to support the recommendations of the NIH Consensus Panel. Other than the report of the Rhode Island Hearing Assessment Project [White and Behrens, 1993], research about newborn hearing screening available at that time was based on small samples of infants (primarily from NICUs) over a short period of time.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The introduction of neonatal hearing screening programs in developed countries over the past decade has meant that hearing loss is now identified in babies as young as a few days or months old, and there is earlier referral and diagnosis than ever before (Dalzell, 2000;White & Maxon, 1995;Yoshinaga-Itano, 2003a). Very young infants and toddlers now represent the majority of paediatric cochlear implant candidates in these countries, and for these children, decisions about candidacy must currently be based solely or primarily on audiometric information if cochlear implants are to be given early, as there are limited tools available to measure speech perception or language abilities in this age group.…”
Section: Criteria For Candidaturementioning
confidence: 99%