Developments in Services of General Interest 2011
DOI: 10.1007/978-90-6704-734-0_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Universal Service Obligations: Fulfilling New Generations of Services of General Economic Interest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The three consumer policy sectors are normally perceived to be in perpetual, uninterrupted and ongoing contact (but running parallel to each other, intersecting when necessary, forced or agreed‐to). Davies and Szyszczak () described this as sector‐specific architecture. In contrast, sector convergence refers to the process of consumer policy actors coming from different directions, and eventually meeting in one place, intentionally or not (NYU Research Center for Leadership in Action, ).…”
Section: Three Convergence‐oriented Governance Models Respecting Compmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The three consumer policy sectors are normally perceived to be in perpetual, uninterrupted and ongoing contact (but running parallel to each other, intersecting when necessary, forced or agreed‐to). Davies and Szyszczak () described this as sector‐specific architecture. In contrast, sector convergence refers to the process of consumer policy actors coming from different directions, and eventually meeting in one place, intentionally or not (NYU Research Center for Leadership in Action, ).…”
Section: Three Convergence‐oriented Governance Models Respecting Compmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The existence of complexity requires a multi‐sector approach to accommodate instances when consumer policy initiatives and interests converge and diverge. Consumer policy governance often happens within a sector‐specific architecture (Davies & Szyszczak, ), an arrangement that complicates the complexity imperative. But this must somehow be accommodated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Universal service obligations may be characterised as obligations assigned to providers to provide services to all citizens in the Member State's geographical area, at an affordable price (e.g. Cremer et al 2001;2003 Green Paper;Davies and Szyszczak 2011, emphasising consumer rights as an additional element). PSOs could be wider in scope and may include USO requirements, as well as other quality standards, such as security of supply, frequency or content (e.g.…”
Section: Policy Documents Defining Sgeismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With reference to the definitions supra, and the use of the USO and PSO concepts by EU institutions and academics, it would seem that in reality USOs and PSOs are much the same thing (Baquero Cruz 2005;Davies and Szyszczak 2011). According to the wording of Article 106(2) TFEU, their relationship to SGEIs cannot be coincidence (Neergaard 2009), but this is of minor importance, since ''particular tasks'' must always be ''assigned'' to the SGEI provider in order for the exemption in Article 106(2) TFEU to apply; hence, USOs, PSOs and SGEIs go hand in hand.…”
Section: Policy Documents Defining Sgeismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Treaty of Lisbon 2009 created a new legal base for measures in Article 14 TFEU and this gave rise to a debate discussed by Maxian Rusche as to the correct use of such regulatory measures. 16 Davies and Szyszczak 2011. This can be used to allow the funding of public services by reading across the exemption into the state aid rules. The Almunia Package used the legal base of Article 106(3) TFEU, focusing upon the state aid 13 Bauby 2011.…”
Section: The Awkwardness Of Public Servicesmentioning
confidence: 99%