2013
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.110.260601
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Universal Slow Growth of Entanglement in Interacting Strongly Disordered Systems

Abstract: Recent numerical work by Bardarson et. al.[1] revealed a slow, logarithmic in time, growth of the entanglement entropy for initial product states in a putative many-body localized phase. We show that this surprising phenomenon results from the dephasing due to exponentially small interactioninduced corrections to the eigenenergies of different states. For weak interactions, we find that the entanglement entropy grows as ξ ln(V t/ ), where V is the interaction strength, and ξ is the single-particle localization… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

28
729
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 614 publications
(758 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
28
729
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The existence of the MBL phase can be proved with minimal assumptions [20]; many of its properties are phenomenologically understood [10,11,16], and some cases can be explored using strong-randomness renormalization group methods [9,[21][22][23]. While the eigenstate properties of MBL systems are in some respects similar to those of noninteracting Anderson insulators, there are important differences in the dynamics, such as the logarithmic spreading of entanglement in the MBL phase [6,9,11,18,19,24,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The existence of the MBL phase can be proved with minimal assumptions [20]; many of its properties are phenomenologically understood [10,11,16], and some cases can be explored using strong-randomness renormalization group methods [9,[21][22][23]. While the eigenstate properties of MBL systems are in some respects similar to those of noninteracting Anderson insulators, there are important differences in the dynamics, such as the logarithmic spreading of entanglement in the MBL phase [6,9,11,18,19,24,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These mechanisms are absent in noninteracting systems: thus, the differences in transport between single-particle and many-body localization can be traced to the much larger connectivity of the many-body Hilbert space. The two mechanisms we discuss involve dissipative dynamics, and are thus distinct from the "pure dephasing" processes that cause the slow growth of entanglement within the MBL phase [11,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phase supports an extensive set of localized integrals of motion [28][29][30][31][32][33] (termed LIOMs or "l-bits"), and certain quantum correlations can retain memory of their initial state even at infinitely late times [34]. The MBL phase resembles noninteracting Anderson insulators in some ways (e.g., spatial correlations decay exponentially, and eigenstates have area-law entanglement [35]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This irreversible growth of entanglementquantified by the growth of the von Neumman entropyis important for several reasons. It is an essential part of thermalization, and as a result has been addressed in diverse contexts ranging from conformal field theory [1][2][3][4] and holography [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] to integrable [13][14][15][16][17][18][19], nonintegrable [20][21][22][23], and strongly disordered spin chains [24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. Entanglement growth is also of practical importance as the crucial obstacle to simulating quantum dynamics numerically, for example, using matrix product states or the density matrix renormalization group [31].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%