1989
DOI: 10.1021/ac00186a018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Universal sulfur detection by chemiluminescence

Abstract: This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Reference herein to any specific commercial product, pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0
3

Year Published

1990
1990
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
35
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These instruments have relatively poor detection limits (> 1 ppm) and are insufficient to detect H 2 S at ambient levels (Benner and Stedman, 1990). Chemiluminescence instruments based on reaction with ClO 2 (Spurlin and Yeung, 1982), O 3 (Kelly et al, 1983) and excited SO (Benner and Stedman, 1989) have a detection limit of 130 pptv for H 2 S, but there exist potential interferences from other hydrocarbons in environments like oil fields. Other commonly used instruments are based on cavity ring-down spectroscopy (CRDS) and gas chromatography coupled with isotope dilution mass spectrometry (Bandy et al, 1985) and sulfur chemiluminescence detection (GC-SCD) (Khan et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These instruments have relatively poor detection limits (> 1 ppm) and are insufficient to detect H 2 S at ambient levels (Benner and Stedman, 1990). Chemiluminescence instruments based on reaction with ClO 2 (Spurlin and Yeung, 1982), O 3 (Kelly et al, 1983) and excited SO (Benner and Stedman, 1989) have a detection limit of 130 pptv for H 2 S, but there exist potential interferences from other hydrocarbons in environments like oil fields. Other commonly used instruments are based on cavity ring-down spectroscopy (CRDS) and gas chromatography coupled with isotope dilution mass spectrometry (Bandy et al, 1985) and sulfur chemiluminescence detection (GC-SCD) (Khan et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Empirical experimentation has established that reduction by hydrogen following oxidative combustion is required to produce the sulfur chemiluminescent species in SCD. This species has been widely believed to be sulfur monoxide (SO) [28], although serious questions about its identification remain [17,29]. Readers are referred to the cited references for more detailed discussions on this topic.…”
Section: Scd Detection Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers and manufacturers have come up with a number of designs over the years in search of a more efficient and stable SCD pyrolyzer. A hydrogen flame burner with a sampling tube was employed as the pyrolyzer in the original design of the flame-based SCD by Benner and Stedman [28]. The basic design was adopted in the first commercial instrument and interfaced with an existing FID on the GC (see Fig.…”
Section: The Evolution Of the Scd Pyrolyzermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pour l'analyse des hydrocarbures gazeux, l'étape la plus importante a été le remplacement des colonnes remplies par des colonnes capillaires à film d'adsorbant, beaucoup plus efficaces et stables [1]. Quant aux détecteurs spécifiques, à côté de l'amélioration de la sensibilité et de la stabilité des principaux (photométrie de flamme et capture d'électrons), sont apparus ces dernières années deux nouveaux détecteurs beaucoup plus sensibles et quantitatifs : l'émission atomique [2,3] et la chimie luminescence [4].…”
Section: Des Progrès Constants En Instrumentationunclassified