2008
DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-148-6-200803180-00003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Universal Surveillance for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in 3 Affiliated Hospitals

Abstract: Background:The effect of large-scale expanded surveillance for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) on health careassociated MRSA disease is not known.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

6
267
2
9

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 398 publications
(284 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
6
267
2
9
Order By: Relevance
“…First, use of these readily available data sets cannot account for all factors associated with infection risk, such as invasive device use or proportion of intensive care unit admissions, which have been shown to be associated with MRSA carriage and infection. 32,35,36 Second, use of these data sets is subject to further validation studies. Despite validated methodology for its use in identifying patient comorbidities,17 a previous version of MRSA ICD-9 codes has been shown to have limitations in ascertainment of MRSA disease.37,38 Although our study uses more recently revised MRSA ICD-9 codes (updated in 2008) meant to increase the specificity and sensitivity for capturing MRSA infection, other databases-such as the Center for Disease Control's National Healthcare Safety Net-work-could be used for identifying HA-MRSA infections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, use of these readily available data sets cannot account for all factors associated with infection risk, such as invasive device use or proportion of intensive care unit admissions, which have been shown to be associated with MRSA carriage and infection. 32,35,36 Second, use of these data sets is subject to further validation studies. Despite validated methodology for its use in identifying patient comorbidities,17 a previous version of MRSA ICD-9 codes has been shown to have limitations in ascertainment of MRSA disease.37,38 Although our study uses more recently revised MRSA ICD-9 codes (updated in 2008) meant to increase the specificity and sensitivity for capturing MRSA infection, other databases-such as the Center for Disease Control's National Healthcare Safety Net-work-could be used for identifying HA-MRSA infections.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estudos avaliaram a vigilância ativa por meio da cultura em swab nasal e/ou de orofaringe e demonstraram que esta medida contribui para redução das taxas de infecção (5)(6) .…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…15 For other nosocomial pathogens, such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, universal screening at admission has resulted in reduced rates of hospital-acquired infections. 16 Recent advances in diagnostic testing for C. difficile have encouraged the evaluation of the feasibility of screening patients at admission for C. difficile and subsequent application of isolation precautions. [17][18][19] An outcome model identified C. difficile screening, coupled with isolation precautions, as a cost-effective intervention when the proportion of admitted patients with C. difficile colonization was greater than approximately 10%.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%