2013
DOI: 10.1103/physreve.87.022115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Universality class of the two-dimensional randomly distributed growing-cluster percolation model

Abstract: We consider the "Touch and Stop" cluster growth percolation (CGP) model on the two-dimensional square lattice. A key parameter in the model is the fraction p of occupied "seed" sites that act as nucleation centers from which a particular cluster growth procedure is started. Here, we consider two growth styles: rhombic and disk-shaped cluster growth. For intermediate values of p the final state, attained by the growth procedure, exhibits a cluster of occupied sites that span the entire lattice. Using numerical … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…initial seed concentration [39], but for intermediate seed concentrations the transitions are found to be continuous which belong to OP universality class [40,47].…”
Section: J Stat Mech (2018) 053206mentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…initial seed concentration [39], but for intermediate seed concentrations the transitions are found to be continuous which belong to OP universality class [40,47].…”
Section: J Stat Mech (2018) 053206mentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The cumulants when plotted against the area fraction for dierent system sizes L are expected to cross each other at a definite p(t) corresponding to the critical threshold of the system for a continuous transition, whereas no such crossing is expected to occur in the case of a discontinuous transition [20]. Though the cumulant has some unusual behavior [64,65], it is rarely used in the study of recent models of percolation except in a few references [47,66]. The values of B L (t) are plotted against p(t) for dierent system sizes L in figure 11(a) for g = 0.1 and in figure 11(b) for g = 0.8.…”
Section: Binder Cumulantmentioning
confidence: 99%