1997
DOI: 10.1088/0305-4470/30/14/009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Universality of subleading corrections for self-avoiding walks in the presence of one-dimensional defects

Abstract: We study three-dimensional self-avoiding walks in presence of a one-dimensional excluded region. We show the appearance of a universal sub-leading exponent which is independent of the particular shape and symmetries of the excluded region. A classical argument provides the estimate: ∆ = 2ν − 1 ≈ 0.175(1). The numerical simulation gives ∆ = 0.18(2).

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(53 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is interesting to observe the dependence of the critical exponents on the dimensionality and the presence of self-avoidance when the cone/wedge is reduced to a semi-infinite line (when α → π) [26][27][28][29]. In d = 2, a semi-infinite line is a significant barrier to the walk and the change in the critical exponent ∆γ π > 0.…”
Section: Measurement Of ∆γαmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is interesting to observe the dependence of the critical exponents on the dimensionality and the presence of self-avoidance when the cone/wedge is reduced to a semi-infinite line (when α → π) [26][27][28][29]. In d = 2, a semi-infinite line is a significant barrier to the walk and the change in the critical exponent ∆γ π > 0.…”
Section: Measurement Of ∆γαmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In d = 2, a semi-infinite line is a significant barrier to the walk and the change in the critical exponent ∆γ π > 0. (In the language of renormalization group, one can say that in this case, the boundary constitutes a relevant perturbation on the free space Hamiltonian [26,29]). In d = 3, the semi-infinite line is not a significant barrier and does not change the critical exponents.…”
Section: Measurement Of ∆γαmentioning
confidence: 99%