2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.topol.2008.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Universally meager sets, II

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Let us cite the following result (see [24,Theorem 1.2]) which completely solves the Baire case and strongly improves our previous results on this topic:…”
Section: Measure and Categorysupporting
confidence: 76%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Let us cite the following result (see [24,Theorem 1.2]) which completely solves the Baire case and strongly improves our previous results on this topic:…”
Section: Measure and Categorysupporting
confidence: 76%
“…A set X in a topological space is 1. always of the first category (AF C) if it is meager relative to every perfect set; 2. universally meager (UM or AF C) if it does not contain a continuous and one-to-one image of a set of second category (see [13], [14], or [23]); 3. meager additive (M * ) if M + X is meager for every meager set M (see [4]). …”
Section: Definitionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The notion of perfectly meager sets has some natural modifications; see [10], [14]. Definition 4.4 (Zakrzewski).…”
Section: Corollary 43 Let F Be a Family Of Subsets Of T Such That Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A subset X of R is universally meager [28] if every Borel isomorphic image of X is meager in R. A subset X of R is a λ-set [18] if every countable subset of X is a G δ -set in X. ≤ω iff X is a λ-set with the Hurewicz property [13,Theorem 3].…”
Section: Definition 43mentioning
confidence: 99%