2000
DOI: 10.1090/s0002-9939-00-05726-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Universally meager sets

Abstract: Abstract. We study category counterparts of the notion of a universal measure zero set of reals.We say that a set A ⊆ R is universally meager if every Borel isomorphic image of A is meager in R. We give various equivalent definitions emphasizing analogies with the universally null sets of reals.In particular, two problems emerging from an earlier work of Grzegorek are solved.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But then E is a homeomorphic copy of H in 2 N which is not PM in 2 N . We close this section by showing that like UM (see [24]) (but, at least consistencywise, unlike PM; see [19]), the class PM is closed under products.…”
Section: Examples Of Countably Perfectly Meager Setsmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…But then E is a homeomorphic copy of H in 2 N which is not PM in 2 N . We close this section by showing that like UM (see [24]) (but, at least consistencywise, unlike PM; see [19]), the class PM is closed under products.…”
Section: Examples Of Countably Perfectly Meager Setsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Under the notation from Theorem 1.1 it follows that if T is universally meager then H is universally meager as well (UM being closed with respect to preimages under continuous injections, see [24]) and so is its homeomorphic copy E. A refinement of this argument also shows that, at least consistently, in contrast to both PM and UM the class PM is not closed with respect to homeomorphic images (see Theorem 3.1(3)). Consequently, unlike in the case of PM and UM, the statement that a subspace A of a Polish space is countably perfectly meager makes sense only if we specify a Polish space X in which it is embedded.…”
Section: §1 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…X ⊂ R n is perfectly meager if X ∩ D is meager in D for each perfect set D ⊂ R n . E. Grzegorek (see [1]) defined a bit stronger (at least under CH) property which was proved to be equivalent to the following one (see [5]). X ⊂ R n is universally meager (universally Baire) if f [X] is meager (has Baire Property) for each Borel isomorphism f : R n → R.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%