Universe as a self‐observable, self‐ethical, life‐embedding mathematical system

Abstract

The non‐well‐founded properties of the empty set provide existence to abstract topological spaces, in which intersections of subspaces with non‐equal dimensions give topologically closed structures. This let space‐time emerge as an ordered sequence of sections upon a defined combination rule, in which interactivity between observable structures is allowed and conditions for conscious perception phenomena are fulfilled. Conditions for evolution and rules for optimal evolution of ecosystems also infer as corollaries. A physical universe and life constitute one single self‐organized and self managed system where life appears as the physical‐like realization of conditions of functionality of the embedding mathematical spaces. The system includes self‐ethical and moral guidelines which should inspire human behavior on Planet Earth.

The imperviance of conceptual systems: cognitive and moral aspects

“…For example, how would one measure the “greatness” of a nation? Then ask, “As that greatness increases, what might happen next?” And “What might be some unanticipated consequences of that increased greatness?” Such questions serve to increase the complexity of our organizational and information systems (Backlund, 2002), increase our societal ability to self-organize (Fuchs and Hofkirchner, 2005), improve the self-observable nature of our shared universe (Bounias, 2002). On another, more personal though less academic level, those techniques lead to more interesting conversations whether one is talking to an American conservative voter or an extremist seeking a caliphate.…”

Axioms from interactions of actors theory

“…When a test mass is released into an n body system it follows a path of minimum action (putting on one side what appears to be the transient maximum of the Tippy Top phenomenon). In a society we can interpret this as optimum action and therefore, local and globally optimum (Bounais, 2002; Pineau, 2002). The ethical implications of local/global optimisation or minimisation of action, the transformation of imperative to permissive or discretionary application, should be considered further.…”