2022
DOI: 10.24193/tras.si2022.6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

University and Community: An Essential Partnership for the Future

Abstract: "The last three decades have witnessed a growing body of literature on the changing role and functions of universities. Concepts such as the ‘engaged university’ ‘multiversity’ and ‘university as a complex enterprise’ have been discussed and evaluated by academics and practitioners. More recently, scholars have also turned their attention to the role of universities within the framework of local innovation ecosystems. The current research investigates how, through a variety of engagement related functions, uni… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other contributions, outcomes are either not empirically confirmed (McHale et al, 2010;Popescu and Elshof, 2016), nor described in a consistent and systematic way (Courtois and Veiga 2020;Kristensen and Karlsen, 2018), echoing the earlier concerns regarding the use of methods. The majority of the contributions focus on outputs as benefits (some studies present them as outcomes), such as courses, programmes, curricula, joint and double degrees (see Hintea, 2012;McHale et al, 2010), and they do not make the link between outputs, as a means to achieve desired outcomes or achievements. For example, Bogdanova et al (2016) contend that in 2013, their strategic partnership generated sixteen conference papers and publications, six bilateral research projects and three funding applications.…”
Section: Benefits In Terms Of Outputs Outcomes Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other contributions, outcomes are either not empirically confirmed (McHale et al, 2010;Popescu and Elshof, 2016), nor described in a consistent and systematic way (Courtois and Veiga 2020;Kristensen and Karlsen, 2018), echoing the earlier concerns regarding the use of methods. The majority of the contributions focus on outputs as benefits (some studies present them as outcomes), such as courses, programmes, curricula, joint and double degrees (see Hintea, 2012;McHale et al, 2010), and they do not make the link between outputs, as a means to achieve desired outcomes or achievements. For example, Bogdanova et al (2016) contend that in 2013, their strategic partnership generated sixteen conference papers and publications, six bilateral research projects and three funding applications.…”
Section: Benefits In Terms Of Outputs Outcomes Impactmentioning
confidence: 99%