2010
DOI: 10.1002/cc.395
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

University‐based community college leadership programs: Where future community college leaders are prepared

Abstract: This chapter describes major factors influencing the shape, content, and direction of the new EdD programs and discusses some unique challenges in establishing a separate cohort program in community college leadership. These insights may be useful as individuals examine graduate programs in leadership development, and as community college search committees seek to hire new leaders.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore Li, Friedel, and Rusche (2011, 15) also found 'coursework of doctoral leadership programs lacks practical relevance and is disconnected from [...] practice'. However as Friedel (2010) outlined, trying to balance the needs of postgraduates, who are both practitioners and aspiring researchers, working within the constraints of their different community colleges is a difficult and challenging task for doctoral providers.…”
Section: Leadership Competencies and Their Developmentmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Furthermore Li, Friedel, and Rusche (2011, 15) also found 'coursework of doctoral leadership programs lacks practical relevance and is disconnected from [...] practice'. However as Friedel (2010) outlined, trying to balance the needs of postgraduates, who are both practitioners and aspiring researchers, working within the constraints of their different community colleges is a difficult and challenging task for doctoral providers.…”
Section: Leadership Competencies and Their Developmentmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Today, the majority (70%) of community college presidents have a degree in education or higher education (Gagliardi et al, 2017), thus these programs provide a critical leadership development opportunity for those not able to attend a national program or for those at institutions without a Grow-Your-Own leadership program (Friedel, 2010). McNair (2010) highlighted how doctoral programs could develop the AACC competencies for community college leaders via their curriculum and program, thereby creating a tighter link between desired and espoused leadership competencies and learning opportunities in graduate programs.…”
Section: Graduate Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, aspiring community college leaders often take part in doctoral programs not specifically focused on community college leadership, so students may not be exposed to applying what they are learning within a community college context. Programs offering a doctorate of education often focus on skills-based courses and are offered at regional universities, which provide increased access to individuals in more remote areas (Eddy & Rao, 2009;Friedel, 2010). Regardless of the degree type or focus, curriculum proves critical to preparation for future leaders and is a focus of the Carnegie project on the education doctorate (Perry, 2015).…”
Section: Graduate Programsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The university community college leadership doctoral programs are especially important given that the vast majority of community college presidents have a doctoral degree in education (Friedel, 2010;Romano et al, 2009). As a result, university community college leadership programs must assume a pivotal role in assuring that the next cadre of presidents are adequately prepared to face the fiscal challenges of the "new norm".…”
Section: The New Norm and Community College Presidents' Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%