2008
DOI: 10.1177/0160323x0804000206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

University-Based Training Programs for Local Elected Officials in the Southeast

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Examining academic and agency relationships is of particular relevance to the public administration scholarly and practitioner communities. Orr and Bennett (2012, 487) examined the “politics of cooperative knowledge production between practitioners and academics in the field of public administration.” Using Raadschelders’ (2008, 489) traditions of public administration scholarship, they effectively assert that “each of Raadschelders’ traditions carries a different set of objectives and therefore different intellectual and political commitments for scholarship.” From Waldo (1977) to Newland (2000) and other public administration scholars (see, e.g., Bolton and Stolcis 2003; Ospina and Dodge 2005; Posner 2009; Radin 2010; Battaglio 2008; Shields 2008; Wang, Bunch, and Stream 2013), the relationship between academics and practitioners is certainly one of the most extensively discussed subjects within the academic walls of public administration and our scholarly publications.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examining academic and agency relationships is of particular relevance to the public administration scholarly and practitioner communities. Orr and Bennett (2012, 487) examined the “politics of cooperative knowledge production between practitioners and academics in the field of public administration.” Using Raadschelders’ (2008, 489) traditions of public administration scholarship, they effectively assert that “each of Raadschelders’ traditions carries a different set of objectives and therefore different intellectual and political commitments for scholarship.” From Waldo (1977) to Newland (2000) and other public administration scholars (see, e.g., Bolton and Stolcis 2003; Ospina and Dodge 2005; Posner 2009; Radin 2010; Battaglio 2008; Shields 2008; Wang, Bunch, and Stream 2013), the relationship between academics and practitioners is certainly one of the most extensively discussed subjects within the academic walls of public administration and our scholarly publications.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%